Jump to content

Talk:Hurricane Fico

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHurricane Fico has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 16, 2006Good article nomineeListed
October 31, 2007Featured topic candidatePromoted
March 5, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
June 17, 2009Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
August 1, 2014Featured topic candidatePromoted
August 17, 2024Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 1, 2005.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Hurricane Fico caused significant damage in Hawaii without making landfall?
Current status: Good article

Image

[edit]

I have a rather interesting predicament here. I have a full-disk image of Hurricanes Fico and Gilma, but I can't remember where I found it. I've searched all over Google but can't refind the image. Any way anyone can help me here? -- Hurricane Eric - my dropsonde - archive 00:54, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Todo

[edit]

Better intro, more impact, more pictures. Jdorje 08:19, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Status

[edit]

This was a well written article and is well referenced. To improve, if it could be expanded in any way it would be good, but other than that all well and good. Jasrocks (talk) 07:55, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps Review: Pass

[edit]

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to update the access dates of the website sources. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 08:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move proposal

[edit]

I think this be moved. The name is used only 1 time. Jeffrey Gu (contribs) 15:45, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, you should add other articles in this boat to the proposal. YE Pacific Hurricane 15:57, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nah, keep this move proposal only for this storm. Agreed, however. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:18, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Same as above, move. – TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:33, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I moved it. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:55, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Fico satellite image is upside down

[edit]

FYI. Thegreatdr (talk) 16:41, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

John doesn't factor in here

[edit]

...because of the way the article is worded. Fico remained the longest-lived northeast Pacific tropical cyclone (east of 180 or 140W, whichever meridian you pick) until Tina in 1992...a record which has not been exceeded using either meridian as a guide. The Pacific hurricane article lumps everything east of the Dateline together...John is in a close horse race with Celeste (1972) if you use the Dateline as the delimiter. Tina stayed east of 180 through its 3+ week life cycle...John did not...staying east of the dateline about 16 days...Celeste 17 days. It's all about semantics. I removed John from the article, unless someone wanted to add a blurb at the bottom about the longest lived northern Pacific tropical cyclone. I don't see a good reason for John to be in the lead though. Thegreatdr (talk) 16:58, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Better question. What is the source for this? YE Pacific Hurricane 22:43, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hurricane Fico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:45, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hurricane_Fico&oldid=1240872461"