Talk:Hurricane Fernanda (1993)

Untitled

At least a "C" in my opinion, probably higher. --Dil Hoom Hoom Kare 19:37, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Fernanda (1993)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 20:58, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I am reviewing this article. The only problem I find is that ref 13 (used twice in the article) is dead. Otherwise, great job! Xtzou (Talk) 20:58, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Ref 13 (used twice) is a dead link and is not in the Internet Archive.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused: }

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

• Just needs the ref fixed. Xtzou (Talk) 20:58, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

• I've fixed the dead linked. Mm40 (talk) 21:21, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks for taking care of that. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:16, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

• Congratulations! Article passes. Xtzou (Talk) 16:39, 21 April 2010 (UTC)