Talk:Hurricane Edith (1971)

Hurricane Edith (1971) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

Hurricane Edith (1971) is part of the 1971 Atlantic hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 24, 2007.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 5, 2006	Peer review	Reviewed
November 16, 2006	Featured article candidate	Promoted
April 5, 2011	Featured topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Featured article

Mexico Mid‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article has been assessed by editors of the WikiProject.

Central America

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Central America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Central America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Central AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Central AmericaCentral America articles

Disaster management Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Image

I found a good radar image, but it's a PDF. Is there some way I can upload PDFs?

E. Brown, Hurricane enthusiast - Squawk Box 21:44, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno, but here's one online after weakening from Cat. 5.

http://www.freewebs.com/hurricanereplenishingproject/HRP%20EDITH%2071.JPG

It's from this website, so I'm not sure if the owner will allow it or not.

http://www.freewebs.com/hurricanereplenishingproject/images.htm

Hurricanehink 03:02, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Class

I lowered it to stub, seeing as there's only one sentence for impact. Hurricanehink (talk) 02:12, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. It looks great now. It must be at least a start class. íslenskur fel lib ylur #12 _(samtal) 12:38, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What more does it need for B class? Hurricanehink (talk) 16:15, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing. You were right to put it on GAN. I doubt any more pictures are available, so I'm not sure what else this could need. The person who reviews this on GAN might be able to help. --Core des at 02:38, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Yea, there are some pictures in the newspaper archive, though all are copyrighted. Hurricanehink (talk) 02:42, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Pass

Good job, as usual. Two notes before it makes its inevitable FAC run:

Consider getting a source on the last part, about it being one of four Cat 5's not to be retired.
A few areas could use some minor cleanup in terms of prose. It reads fine, but could use a copyeditor before you explore further promotion.

Congrats on another great hurricane article. --badlydrawnjeff talk 19:55, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should instantly be upgraded to A-class. CrazyC83 21:06, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If Hink's record is any indication, this will be a FA in a month anyway. --badlydrawnjeff talk 23:20, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) Hurricanehink (talk) 23:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You were off by about two weeks... too early Tito xd^(?!?) 20:15, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Almost ready for FAC

I think this is almost ready for WP:FAC personally. CrazyC83 01:41, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would anyone opposed to me putting it up for FAC? I currently have Fabian up, so if there's some outstanding objections I might need some help getting it done. However, Edith seems ready. Hurricanehink (talk) 01:52, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No objections here. CrazyC83 05:46, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto. íslenskur fel lib ylur #12 _(samtal) 14:48, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rapidly, Rapidly, Rapidly.....

In the intro of the page you use the word "rapidly" 3 times. Maybe you should change this, as this article is being reviewed for FA status.-Hairchrm 06:16, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Broken link

The link for the last ref ([1]) is broken. --- RockMFR 23:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing. Apparently the NHC changes the page name every year (so it is now at [2]). —Cuiviénen 00:29, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And the Wayback Machine doesn't have a record of it, as it blocks the spider via robots.txt. Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 00:32, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Try web cite - http://www.webcitation.org Raul654 05:51, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, doesn't work either. Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 07:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A face.

Is it just me or does that picture resemble a face with it's cheeks puffed up and blowing...weird. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by GothmogII (talk • contribs) 11:27, 24 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Hey, you're right! Brutannica 03:49, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Since it's a FA, it has been vandalized a bit. Semi-protection until off front page? -Domovoi 17:50, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, it's still manageable. Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 21:09, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Hurricane Edith (1971). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 April 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) TonyBallioni (talk) 21:57, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Edith (1971) → Hurricane Edith – Much more prominent than any other Ediths. Thus this article is considered by me primary topic. --SMB99thx XD (contribs) 09:44, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose no need to pick Top Hurricane Edith, the 1963 and 1955 ones still did damage. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:19, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above, not a clear primary topic. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:11, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no it's not the primary topic because it's not more prominent by a wide major than the others. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 19:05, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Negative, ghostrider, for the same reasons already listed. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk · contributions) 21:46, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

WP:URFA/2020

Decent amount of scholarly literature discussed here (I tried to weed out earlier Ediths but there are some still here)
The article claims there is no known Mexico impact. While I haven't checked Mexican newspapers, I would implore that impact definitely did occur. The storm made landfall in Mexico twice. The Mexican gov't produced [3] and [4] detailing the rainfall.

This feels so wrong on so many levels, but I regretfully have to send this to WP:FARGIVEN since there's a lot missing. CCI check is not done. Noah^Talk 20:18, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hurricane Noah: Do you still have the same concerns listed above for this article? If so, would you be interested in bringing this article to WP:FAR? Z1720 (talk) 14:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No progress has been made. I don't have the time to raise a FAR and participate since I am heading into finals. Noah, AA^Talk 22:31, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]