Jump to content

Talk:Hurricane Celia (2010)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHurricane Celia (2010) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 28, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
October 20, 2010Featured article candidateNot promoted
November 1, 2010Good article nomineeListed
November 21, 2010Featured topic candidatePromoted
August 17, 2024Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Good article

Note for future

[edit]

To keep the List of Category 5 Pacific hurricanes topic featured, this article needs to be at good article status (or featured) within three months after the Tropical Cyclone Report is released. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:21, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By my maths this needs to be up at GA by January 7 2011 since the TCR was released yesterday.Jason Rees (talk) 16:35, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Celia (2010)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: YE Tropical Cyclone This is an excellent article (I read it many many times since it was created), but I noted two issues. The first one was the image infobox is not of peak intensity, when there is one available and is listed. another problem is technically false info because did not Celia meet the criteria for rapid deeping it meet explosive deeping(unless I calculated it incorrectly). Good luck making those three minor improvements. The article is being placed on hold for 168 hours. YE Tropical Cyclone 14:07, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hate and was extremely hesitant,but I have too fail the article. I strongly disagree with the consensuses, but oh well. There is nothing you can do about it. Oh well. I have assed it at B class though, but this still meets the GA criteria 5 of the 6 GA criteria. when It goes back to GAN, I am ready for review and will likely pass this article. YE Tropical Cyclone 18:49, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Just a note about the main image, it's the best MODIS image available for the storm so it's preferable over the lower resolution (and quality) IR image when Celia was a Category 5. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 19:15, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Celia (2010)/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: YE Tropical Cyclone 02:13, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know I am retired, but per request. I am reviewing this article for GAN. I mentioned all the issues in the first GAN, and they were replied. So, I will likely pass this page. YE Tropical Cyclone 02:13, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is official. Pass time. Congrats for CB. YE Tropical Cyclone 17:14, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Cool, thanks YE. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 17:46, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hurricane Celia (2010). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:52, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Celia (2010). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:29, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hurricane_Celia_(2010)&oldid=1240874521"