Jump to content

Talk:Hurricane Beulah

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleHurricane Beulah was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 2, 2008Good article nomineeListed
September 19, 2014Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Good article review

[edit]
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Great job Dr.Roth, this article has been here three years and yet has had no one to tackle the work on it. It reaches all Good Article Criteria. Nice job.Mitch32contribs 18:35, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tornadoes

[edit]

If we count the tornadoes from about the 16-17 to the 22nd, the storm would have produced 117 tornadoes excluding those in the Great Lakes, Florida and Central Plains that took place at that time - thus it would rank second. The three tornadoes on the 23/24 since it occurred after dissipation will not count. --JForget 17:09, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Damage

[edit]

In the infobox it says that it caused $1.1 billion in damage unadjusted, but all of the damage info in the article says that that is in 2000 or 2005 dollars. I'm inclined to believe that the infobox is right. Right? bob rulz (talk) 12:46, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Town noted on image may be incorrect.

[edit]

The city name on image under the section "3.3 United States" may be incorrect. It notes the damage and flooding in "McAllen, TX." However, the sign notes the location of the "Palm Lounge," which is located in Brownsville, TX., and is located there to this day. Therefore, it has to be the city of Brownsville, TX. Rockfan (talk) 06:52, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Death toll

[edit]

TOTAL - 659

  • Martinique - 13
  • St. Vincent - 2
  • Puerto Rico - 1
  • Dominican Republic - 2
  • Haiti - 0
  • Mexico - 630
  • United States - 11

Sources

[edit]
Meteorological history
Impact

Cyclonebiskit (talk) 14:49, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Downgrading to C-class

[edit]

Given how much info isn't in the article, how short it is, and the lack of references, I'm boldly downgrading this to just C-class. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:23, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Beulah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]