Talk:Humberside Fire and Rescue Service

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firefighting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to firefighting on Wikipedia! If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.FirefightingWikipedia:WikiProject FirefightingTemplate:WikiProject FirefightingFirefighting articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Yorkshire Mid‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Humberside Fire and Rescue Service is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lincolnshire Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pages updates required.

Due to a disagreement with Humberside Fire & Rescue Service whilst on my work placement I am unable to edit this page anymore. Therefore I require some assistance in bringing this page up to date.

Due to HFRS publishing a new website many links are now dead and need updating. There may also be a change in staff figures at individual stations and the location of appliances as new information has also been published on the website.

http://www.humbersidefire.gov.uk/your-area/hull-community-protection-unit

http://www.humbersidefire.gov.uk/your-area/east-riding-community-protection-unit

http://www.humbersidefire.gov.uk/your-area/north-east-lincolnshire-community-protection-unit

http://www.humbersidefire.gov.uk/your-area/north-lincolnshire-community-protection-unit

Information also needs to be updated regarding the new Clough Road development, which was granted planning pemissions be Hull City Council as reported on Friday 5 April 2013. http://www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk/New-Hull-station-gets-ahead/story-18618637-detail/story.html#axzz2QwbUSek7

I also believe that information regarding Firefighters at Pocklington are being trained as first responders as part of a six month trial http://www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk/Firefighters-medical-training/story-18677247-detail/story.html#axzz2QwbUSek7

Thank you for your help in making this a better page.

WolfTM2012 (talk) 21:34, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have started update - there is a problem with Goole & Brough pages on the HFRS web site as they do not appear to have the figures given. Also Scunthorpe appears to have lost the retained element so I have removed them from the table. Keith D (talk) 23:31, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

According to the main CPU page for North Lincolnshire, Scunthorpe has not lost it's retained element. I suspect this is an error on Humberside's part. I don't know if I could go talk to Corporate Communications, who administer the webpage, whilst I'm on placement as my Line Manager does not like me creating work for other sections. WolfTM2012 (talk) 15:34, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Humberside Fire and Rescue Service/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

Have pictures of all Fire Station in the Area

WolfTM2012 (talk) 19:12, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reqires addition of more inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
Expand on history

Keith D 12:40, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 20:30, 20 February 2013 (UTC). Substituted at 18:28, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Humberside Fire and Rescue Service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121002030137/http://www.humbersidefire.gov.uk/community/about-us.htm?aboutUs=1 to http://www.humbersidefire.gov.uk/community/about-us.htm?aboutUs=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:53, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

All the station original research (WP:OR) has been removed and replaced with content from (currrently) one reliable source (WP:RS), the fire services "Your area" pages. It may be possible to find other sources, such as freedom of information requests, that give additional detail e.g., more specific vehicle information, or station call signs. However, I would argue that what is there already is too much according to WP:NOTDIR and to add more would be to stray into excessive detail / trivia. Certainly nothing should be added without a verifiable source, e.g. a change to the pages above. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:31, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@10mmsocket: Well, thanks a lot for the cleanup tag within minutes of my edit. I've just gone well out of my way today to get an updated photo of Clough Road. While I retrospectively think you may be right on calling WP:NOTDIR - I've chopped down a fair few bus company pages for being too enthusiast-oriented - and I do appreciate that the article was a bit cluttered, what would you instead suggest would be a 'notable' station for inclusion in the gallery? Maybe some of the more minor stations can hang around in Wikimedia or in articles about the towns they serve? Or should the stations gallery be gutted and replaced with some other subject? I don't want to look like I'm running the show, but if anything, I just don't want the effort to be all for nothing. --Hullian111 (talk) 21:57, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On balance, there are way more problems on UK FRS articles than too many images. What you have done getting together all the images represents and amazing effort and I have removed the tag. I do think that the station callsigns are original research so a reference for those would be useful, but otherwise I apologise for not properly recognising the work that you have put in. 10mmsocket (talk) 06:27, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

The HM Queen Elizabeth II meets Humberside Fire and Rescue Service 1987.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:08, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]