Talk:Hugh of Fauquembergues
Appearance
Hugh of Fauquembergues has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 21, 2018. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Hugh of Fauquembergues appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 March 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Hugh of Fauquembergues/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 15:18, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Will start soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 15:18, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Criteria
[edit]GA Criteria
|
---|
GA Criteria:
|
- No DAB links
- No Dead links
- Images appropriately licensed
Prose Suggestions
[edit]Lede
[edit]- Baldwin I of Jerusalem granted him Galilee after its first prince, Tancred, who was Baldwin's opponent, suggest Baldwin I of Jerusalem granted him Galilee after its first prince, Tancred, who was a rival of Baldwin,
- against Toghtekin, Atabeg of Damascus. suggest against Toghtekin, the Atabeg of Damascus.
Early life
[edit]- but their conflict was soon resolved. suggest but their conflict was soon made unnecesary.
Prince of Galilee
[edit]- However, the battle was not lost, because the king made a surprise attack against the Egyptians and defeated them. suggest However, they were not beaten, because the king made a surprise attack against the Egyptians and defeated them.
- That is all of my suggestions, passing now. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:34, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Iazyges:, thank you for your review and assessment. Sorry, I do not understand your above remarks. Do you suggest that the article should be modified? Borsoka (talk) 04:39, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Borsoka: No problem. I am suggesting the text that comes first be changed into the text after "suggest". Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 05:47, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Iazyges:, thank you for your review and assessment. Sorry, I do not understand your above remarks. Do you suggest that the article should be modified? Borsoka (talk) 04:39, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Bad booy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.192.232.224 (talk) 17:25, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- History good articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (military) articles
- Low-importance biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- GA-Class biography (royalty) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (royalty) articles
- Royalty work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class Middle Ages articles
- Low-importance Middle Ages articles
- GA-Class history articles
- All WikiProject Middle Ages pages
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- GA-Class French military history articles
- French military history task force articles
- GA-Class Middle Eastern military history articles
- Middle Eastern military history task force articles
- GA-Class Medieval warfare articles
- Medieval warfare task force articles
- GA-Class Crusades articles
- Crusades task force articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
- Wikipedia Did you know articles