Jump to content

Talk:Hot tower

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge proposal

[edit]

Why should this article be merged? It's only part of a hurricane. --Axeman89 (added by Deditos)

The "hot tower" hypothesis is an important concept in tropical meteorology. I think it deserves its own page and some more explanation, I've made a start... Rahnle 21:56, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that there should be no merge, most 'hot towers' are not related to tropical cyclone. There's more to tropical meteorology than hurricanes [sigh]. Deditos 17:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Confusion

[edit]

I find this quite confusing. The first one and three quarter paragraphs are about convenction cells rising through the tropopause, and thus contributing to (or even driving) global circulation. But then suddenly the last line of para 2 it switches to talking about the eye and eyewall (presumably of a hurricane/cyclone) - but hurricanes haven't even been mentioned up to here. Then the last para is talking only about hurricanes, and one in particular. What has the amount of damage caused by one particular cyclone (presumably in USA) got to do with the global circulation?

It would be much more understandable if the connection between these hot cells and cyclones was spelled out. Do you only get hot cells in cyclones? Do Cyclones only occurr in hot cells? Or can hot cells and cyclones exist independently from each other? Baska436 (talk) 11:33, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hot tower. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:31, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]