Talk:Hope chest
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AhamblyLIB100.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:51, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Cedar Chest?
[edit]Cedar Chest redirects to Hope Chest? These are different things, why redirect it? A Cedar Chest is for storing items. It's made out of Red Cedar, which is particularly aromatic, and moths hate it. In short: It keeps the bugs away from your blankets. A Hope Chest is a chest an unmarried woman would use to store up items for use when she got married. The only thing it has in common with a Cedar Chest is that they are both chests. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.216.125.56 (talk) 04:42, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- I imagine the reason is The Lane Company patented their "Lane Cedar Chest" which was advertised across the U.S. as a hope chest in the early 1900s, and they are the main material that such hope chests were typically made of. While I don't know how useful the redirect is or general rule of redirects, neither 'pine chest' or 'maple chest' have their own page because they are, as you said, just chests made of a specific material. If any other material had their own page, I don't think it would redirect. 2601:603:5300:87F0:B863:FC5D:37FA:64B5 (talk) 02:50, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Dictionary
[edit]Isn't this just a dictionary definition? 125.255.9.231 03:38, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- I don't think so. Maikel 12:22, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- However, in its current form it could easily be merged into Dowry. Don't start a new lemma for everything, people, unless you're really going to work on it! Maikel 12:34, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
2007-04-6 Automated pywikipediabot message
[edit]This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
--CopyToWiktionaryBot 04:37, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Lane company patents
[edit]- US 1090999 ??
- US 1987018
- US 2023465 Cedar chest
- US 2058571 Cedar receptacle and method of coating surfaces thereof
- US 2136141 Hinge
- US 2161519 Lock
- US 2188707 Hardware for cedar chests and the like
- US 2327871 Cedar chest
- US 2386440 Cedar chest
- US 2345271 Aroma tight drawer
- US 2355542 Hinge
These are read from a photo in the Schleining book. Some I haven't quite deciphered yet, nor have I found the interesting patent, the one for the sliding mitre. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:42, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Searches [1]
Searches: CROCKER ERNST C
- US 2716621 Interior finish for cedar chests
- US 1999960 Cedar receptacle
- US 1808838 Method of aroma testing of cedar chests
Searches: LOFTIN GRADY A
Removed tag requesting information on the dower system in India.
[edit]This page is about an article used in European and European-derived cultures. The dower system in India is a fascinating topic that deserves to be included on a page more closely related to it than this one. As far as I'm aware, the proto-into-european cultural crossover happened so far in the past that it's doubtful that the use of dower chests in the west and in India rose from the same cultural root. Oona Wikiwalker (talk) 04:19, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- That seems reasonable to me! Brad606 (talk) 16:12, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Grammar
[edit]unclosed quotation mark in the historical origins header, and after that there's a paragraph with seemingly no start that doesn't seem like it goes there. Hexahydride (talk) 13:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Broadening/renaming?
[edit]"Hope chest", as the article itself points out, is a very culturally-specific term. This article might be more useful if renamed and refocused on the topic of marriage chests in general, at least in European and North American contexts. MorrisStuff (talk) 03:34, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Genizah quotation
[edit]Is the quotation regarding the Genizah documents in the "Arab origin" section appropriate? I suspect not. The Genizah documents belonged to the Jewish community and reflect Jewish customs, not Arab customs.Bill (talk) 23:55, 26 September 2024 (UTC)