Talk:History of phycology

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Algae Top‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Algae, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the photosynthetic organisms commonly called algae and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AlgaeWikipedia:WikiProject AlgaeTemplate:WikiProject AlgaeAlgae articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Help will be accepted

To make this a fully international article it would be best if others would add to it. Further, help and advice, as to how best to gramatically devide it into paragraphs will be welcome!Osborne

Started this - more to do. Osborne

References

An earlier effort to enter a reference lost almost the whole article. Opening a previous edit and deleting the effort at making a ref (Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page). OK but how do I get this into the List of References in alphabetic and numerical order? Osborne 12:25, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have started again entering the refs in the text in numerical order. 81.144.158.195 12:27, 18 January 2007 (UTC) Having received advice I have now started entering the references as required by Wiki. - I hope! I am leaving in the authors name in the meanwhile as a check.Osborne 14:08, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See the references!.(e.g.Dixon, P.S. 1973. Biology of the Rhodophyta. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh. ISBN 0 05 002485X) Is listed twice - I did not list them both - however BOTH are not needed and I am frightened of correcting this, I fear I would gt the refs all mixed up! If anyone can do it I will be grateful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Osborne (talk • contribs) 16:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Translations:

Should this be translated into other languages? How? & by whom? Osborne 10:26, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Considering a rearrangement

Should this article be arranged into two parrallel sections: 1. the history of the exploration of the world. 2. the advancement of knowledge about the plants themselves? Osborne#

"Trivia" section

I've removed it, as it only contained the following out-of-place limerick:

"There was a young man named Linnaeus,

Who found that all nature was chaos,

He set out to describe,

Every species and tribe,

Species that nature would no longer betray us."

Akriasas 18:50, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that - I rather liked it! Osborne

Anna Atkins' work

--

This image and a sentence about Atkins' work would be appropriate for this article. --68.127.232.132 (talk) 17:14, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Translation

Interested - the French translation seems quite different! My French is poor but...well, well, well... Osborne 18:56, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Lead section too short

Lead section is very short for a B-class article. It does not really summarize the content. · · · Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 17:55, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]