Jump to content

Talk:History of the Taliban

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:History of Taliban)
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Taliban's rise to power. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:44, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Taliban's rise to power. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:52, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New section.

[edit]

The Taliban has once again taken over many parts of the country. It's only fair that a "Resurgence" section is added. People need to know about this when they read this article. Do not try to brush this under the carpet.150.101.89.147 (talk) 07:20, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about the formation of the Taliban in the mid-1990s; the 2021 Taliban offensive is a separate topic. Even if material from the latter article were relevant here, your spamming of breaking news reports inaccurately asserting that "The US and UK are conducting a re-entry into Afghanistan" (based on the U.S. evacuating its embassy in Kabul) is not helpful or constructive to the development of Wikipedia's encyclopedic project.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 13:50, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No definite article in title?

[edit]

Should this article be titled 'History of the Taliban'? Nurg (talk) 08:38, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That article is currently a redirect which needs to be deleted first. Keepcalmandchill (please ping in responses) (talk) 10:16, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User:Keepcalmandchill. I see. Do you agree that would be a good idea? There's no unusual grammatical thing at play, is there? Nurg (talk) 11:54, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 25 August 2021

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 19:34, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


History of TalibanHistory of the Taliban – When the Taliban are mentioned in a Wikipedia article, it tis almost always preceded by a definite article. Interstellarity (talk) 18:49, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

false citation?

[edit]

the sentence preceding the [43] citation here doesn't match up with what the book says at all, it says nothing about mujahideen surrendering to the Taliban at all 216.252.90.24 (talk) 17:21, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in History of the Taliban

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of History of the Taliban's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Anderson-2-2022":

  • From Taliban: Anderson, Jon Lee (28 February 2022). "The Taliban Confront the Realities of Power". The New Yorker. Retrieved 3 March 2022.
  • From Mullah Omar: Anderson, Jon Lee (28 February 2022). "The Taliban Confront the Realities of Power". The New Yorker. Retrieved 19 June 2023.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. Feel free to remove this comment after fixing the refs. AnomieBOT 19:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]