Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the History of Japan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
History of Japan was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 13:14, November 11, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia articles
This article was copy edited by Relentlessly, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 22 October 2015.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
The second paragraph in the § Heisei period (1989–2019) section on Japan's relations with China and Korea seems excessively long and inappropriate as a descriptive summary of the Heisei period, especially considering that the paragraph on the 3/11 earthquake is only two sentences long. The paragraph seems to be a manifestation of Wikipedia's systemic bias, in which editors add information of their own interest without considering its proportion to other parts of the article. 2602:FC24:13:1:E4F7:9065:0:1 (talk) 16:03, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have at least partially addressed these issues by toning down non-NPOV language and slightly expanding the 3/11 section -- Ash-Gaar (talk) 07:18, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are two paragraphs on Oda Nobunaga and Tokugawa Ieyasu in the Muromachi period section that seem out of place as they discussed people and events of the Azuchi–Momoyama period. They also duplicate the content of that period in relation to the two individuals. I would suggest they be deleted. Nengoro (talk) 18:19, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
