User talk:Ash-Gaar

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Hi thanks for creating Shigesaburō Maeo, which I’ve just reviewed. Is it based on the article in Japanese Wikipedia? If so I need to add a template to the talk page. Many thanks. Mccapra (talk) 03:08, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mccapra: Thanks for your help! No, I didn't base it on the Japanese wikipedia page. I cited my sources and I mostly relied on the Gotoda dissertation that I cited, which has a lengthy biography of Maeo. I feel that the Japanese page is way too detailed and in the weeds for what would be useful on English wikipedia. The one thing I borrowed from the Japanese wikipage is the image of Maeo. --Ash-Gaar (talk) 03:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Public Order and Police Law moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Public Order and Police Law, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Salimfadhley (talk) 23:40, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Salimfadhley: This is not my content. As mentioned in my page creation summary, this is longstanding content that was wrongly lumped into the Peace Preservation Law page. If you feel it is better to completely delete this longstanding content, I guess that is on you. --Ash-Gaar (talk) 02:14, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Public Order and Police Law has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Public Order and Police Law. Thanks! Salimfadhley (talk) 23:42, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Safety Preservation Law moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Safety Preservation Law, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Salimfadhley (talk) 23:44, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Salimfadhley: This is not my content. As mentioned in my page creation summary, this is longstanding content that was wrongly lumped into the Peace Preservation Law page. If you feel it is better to completely delete this longstanding content, I guess that is on you. --Ash-Gaar (talk) 02:14, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I never saw that summary. Do you know who created two un-sourced articles? Surely we have a problem with that, right? Salimfadhley (talk) 09:26, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Salimfadhley: I agree that a lack of sources is a problem, but at least two other editors looked at those articles and agreed that it was better to keep that content in mainspace and tag it as needing citations rather than just remove it completely. Before you removed them to draft, another editor with approval privileges marked them as "approved." As for who created the content, looking back through the edits, I see that it was user MChew back in 2006 when they made this edit. Those other laws are not called "Peace Preservation Law" in Japanese, nor in English-language scholarship, so they had to be moved to their own articles. I was a bit surprised they were removed to draft, since they had been around for so long, since I had put some effort into cleaning them up a bit, and since other editors had already reviewed them. I completely understand your concerns about sourcing, but I'm super busy these days and unfortunately I don't have the time or the interest to source somebody else's content. --Ash-Gaar (talk) 20:30, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to resubmit it. Perhaps those other editors of whom you speak will be willing to bring it back to main space. Me personally, I'd rather not have content which cannot be verified. Salimfadhley (talk) 00:03, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Improvement of Anpo protests

@Ash-Gaar are you interested in improving the Anpo protests article by adding more references?

Thanks - Yokohama1989 (talk) 18:50, 2 July 2022 (UTC) .[reply]

Hi there! Thanks for your interest in improving that article! But to be honest, I'm not so interested at the present time in adding more references. I did read through the Kapur book and it seemed fairly comprehensive and up-to-date. It would take a lot of time to read through other sources just to corroborate what the Kapur book said, and I'm super busy these days. But if that's something you're interested in doing, please feel free! Ash-Gaar (talk) 13:17, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

US-Japan map

Why did you delete my image in the Us-japan Alliance page ? it wasn't unhelpful at all. it was a well done map that covered the area of the treaty. Also stop accusing people of being troll when you foolishly disagree with their work. grew up man. Bourenane Chahine (talk) 03:01, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a map of the world with Japan and the United States colored in. It's only useful if you don't know where Japan and the United States are located on a map of the world. Also, it's not well-made. There is an extremely confusing blue square near Africa that should not be there. Ash-Gaar (talk) 05:18, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"It's only useful if you don't know where Japan and the United States are located on a map of the world." YES! you said it yourself, it's for the people that don't know where those two countries are situated, not everybody know maps very well.

it is well made lol, the bleu square is absolutely not confusing in the slightest and certainly not extremely haha, you are just trying to find excuses to delete my work.

thank you for making my day with this comment man. extremely confusing haha . Bourenane Chahine (talk) 07:45, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

and to answer that "This is not adding information. This is just a map of the world with the United States and Japan colored in. Please explain why this is necessary for anyone other than people who don't know where the United States and Japan are located on a map.)"

a map if a useful information, even though i am repeating myself because of you i will say it again, not everybody know where those two countries are situated, therefore it is helpful for those people that have trouble with map.

it was never meant to be for people that know where those two countries are situated in the map, please explain to me what made you think that i made it for people like you ? Bourenane Chahine (talk) 07:48, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have addressed all of your concern here, even the most stupid one, and you have addressed none of mine, i will not address any father of your concern, you are trying to deliberately obstruct my work, you want to make Wikipedia a bad place, you should be ashamed of your behavior Bourenane Chahine (talk) 08:18, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reported, i must notify you because of wikipedia rule Bourenane Chahine (talk) 08:38, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fusako Shigenobu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 747.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A comment unrelated to Wikipedia work

Hey. I've since moved to Tokyo, and I've been studying at Todai for a while. I don't know why, but I kind of wanted to let you know. You've been very important to me in the world of Wikipedia. Roniius^{talk to me} 18:00, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message, and congrats on your move to Japan! That's very exciting! I appreciate your kinds words and likewise have enjoyed working with you on some Wikipedia articles and really appreciate all your contributions. Best of luck with your studies at Tōdai! --Ash-Gaar (talk) 15:16, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese translations' request

User talk:Immanuelle/Proposed article translations. --95.233.233.43 (talk) 10:05, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Ash-Gaar. Thank you for your work on National Defense Brotherhood. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thanks for making Koichi Sugii article best RevolutionaryWar (talk) 00:54, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have a barnstar.

		All-Around Amazing Barnstar
		In my short career here on Wikipedia, you've stood out to me as one of the most pleasant and good people on this website. I've never once seen you get mad or show any ill will towards anyone at all. It may be an expectation for all editors, but its an expectation rarely met. Your contributions have been always helpful, and always improving the project as much as possible. 本当におつかれさまでした。 DarmaniLink (talk) 20:53, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

		The Special Barnstar
		Thank you for your countless edits on articles relating to Japan. I like to specifically thank you for your contributions to Japan Socialist Party. Jon698 (talk) 17:21, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ^×^

Thank you for correcting some of my work on the Yukio Mishima article! I'm currently being cautious & not doing anything too complex -basically I'm sticking to typos with occasional dips into basic copy editing. The MOS is massive, so it's really helpful to learn how my work can be improved to meet those standards, so thank you again! Blue-Sonnet (talk) 18:37, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Blue-Sonnet! Thank you for your kind words, and for your hard work trying to improve the Mishima article. It was a bit of a mess when I first started working on it a few years ago, but it is much improved now! There is still a ways to go, but I hope we can make it an "A" article someday! --Ash-Gaar (talk) 17:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely, we can do it! Blue-Sonnet (talk) 18:29, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]