Talk:Hailakandi

Guideline

Those who are interested in developing this page are requested to follow the norms laid down in Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Cities. Please provide a proper reference or source for whatever you add to this page, in order that others can verify the facts from that reference. Matter without reference is likely to be deleted. -- P.K.Niyogi 17:44, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indic script

@Sitush and Human3015:, as both of you said on Srinagar talk page that there is consensus for not removing Indic script from lead of place names. But see history of this page, Kashmiri is keep on removing Indic script. I told him about this issue on his talk page, [1], read his reply there, he said "private discussion" doesn't matters. So same applies to Urdu language too. There is no community consensus for not removing Urdu from Article. Same rule should be applied to all Indian languages. --Vtk1987 (talk) 23:40, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The application of this rule is specific to WikiProject India, not to any language. kashmiri ^TALK 01:48, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kashmiri, Ok, then Srinagar and all Jammu and Kashmir related articles comes under Wikiproject India, they have tags of the same, so don't hesitate to delete Urdu text anytime. Thank you. --Human3015 02:04, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As I have said elsewhere, in a discussion involving Vtk1987, we only show the scripts for official languages of the place that the article is describing. Is Urdu an official language for Hailakandi? Not according to the infobox, it isn't, although I think that the proliferation of languages in India means that we really should source all such statements (including the Bangla one that is stated here). - Sitush (talk) 04:52, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see the issue here is not about which language but about where to show it. I am comfortable with it just being shown in the infobox, which has equal prominence to the lead and appears to be the thing that is often "scraped" by Google in their search results. As of now, I don't think anyone has found the relevant thread at WT:INB. - Sitush (talk) 04:56, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hailakandi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.eci.nic.in/eci_main/statistical
Corrected formatting/usage for http://hailakandi.nic.in/edu-institute.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060504181808/http://archive.eci.gov.in/se2001/background/S03/AS_ACPC.pdf to http://archive.eci.gov.in/se2001/background/S03/AS_ACPC.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:22, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]