Talk:Gunfire locator

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Law Enforcement Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Military history: Technology

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article name change suggestion

I'd suggest that the name of this article be changed. A lot of the weapons that may be detected by these systems ae not classified as guns. Mortars and shoulder fired rockets are not guns, but are detected by several different systems. Nik.martin 21:14, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Temporal Pattern Gunshot Recognition Systems Category

Sberger11604 (I assume Steven Berger from Safety Dynamics), are you implying that your gunshot location system is *not* an acoustical detection system- and thus warrants its own category? There are numerous mentions of both "acoustics" and "sound" in both your "Temporal Pattern Recognition System" description, and Safety Dynamics' website.Drewery 01:13, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is no implication that the SENTRI gunshot detection or recognition product is not acoustic. It is definitely a system that receives acoustic signals and performs signal analysis to identify a gunshot v. everything else. It deserves its own category because of the unique approach of the signal analysis, which mimics the functions of the human brain through neural networks to identify a gunshot by its temporal pattern. This approach can also be used to identify vehicle engines, footsteps, and chain-link fence disturbance, for example. The Lab for Neural Dynamics at USC applies this approach to develop pulsatile sound and security breach sound recognition capability. Typically, this approach returns a higher rate of recognition, especially in urban environments where buildings can adversely effect the path of shockwaves, or in environments with high noise. This same concept drives research performed at the Theodore W. Berger Labs at USC for the purpose of developing neural prostheses. See http://www.neural-prosthesis.com. Sberger11604 (talk) 06:59, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So if we are to take Dr. Berger at his word, then we should put his invention underneath acoustic systems instead of calling it out as a first-level sensing modality akin to "acoustic" or "optical." I just did that. Also, there's a section down below about a specific vendor (ShotSpotter) that surely must have come from their website--took that out. TruthInWikis (talk) 06:42, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Washington Post Article

Could be incorporated, goes over some statistics in a real-world setting. [1] Gront (talk) 06:52, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done--LCoolo 01:55, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Ok.. well now it's actually incorporated. At least, in its own section. There's still some info that could potentially be worked into the existing description. --Qwerty0 (talk) 08:38, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Menlo Park system actually in Redwood City

The original system was only tested in Menlo Park experimentally. It was deployed in Redwood City.[2]. Technically, it's a collection of hard-wired microphones on telephone poles connected to a PC with a data collection card running a LabView application. The microphones each have an audio compressor which reduces the frequency response but increases the dynamic range, so the pressure wave from a gunshot is recognizable.--John Nagle (talk) 03:11, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additional References

Calling the shots How gunshot-detecting microphones help police curb crime Economist Sep 13th 2014 | WASHINGTON, DC [3]

ShotSpotter detection system documents 39,000 shooting incidents in the District By Andras Petho, David S. Fallis and Dan Keating November 2, 2013 [4]

Gunshot Detection: An Innovative Smart City Technology with Huge Potential Kelsey Voss/October 12, 2015 [5]

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY CUTS GANG RELATED GUN CRIME by Stephen Bryen [6]

How can acoustics technology help police locate gunshots? BY JULIA LAYTON [7]

Gunshot recognition system aims to counter crime Jul 7, 2005 By Megan Reichgott, Associated Press [8]

Shots heard around the District By Bonnie Berkowitz, Emily Chow, Dan Keating and James Smallwood, Published: Nov. 2, 2013 [9]

kgrr ^talk 09:45, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seth Conrad Rich

Murder_of_Seth_Rich "Police officers patrolling the area responded to the gun shots around 4:20 a.m. using the ShotSpotter system to find the location of the shooting." [10] kgrr ^talk 09:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]