Talk:Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2022

Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2022 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 9, 2023. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2022 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Eurovision Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eurovision, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Eurovision-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EurovisionWikipedia:WikiProject EurovisionTemplate:WikiProject EurovisionEurovision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

National final

@LWL12345: I understand the points you made, but as far as I can tell from the sources the plan is to hold an internal selection and a switch towards a national final seems to be nothing but rumored. There is also another reason why I created this as a draft: to include all the artists who confirmed their application without having to bother about their notability in the article until there is an official announcement from ERT. 〜イヴァンスクルージ九十八［IvanScrooge98］（会話） 09:54, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, I guess we should just keep everything as it is right now but if you insist to stick with the information you added feel free to do so and I'll try to edit the text a bit (as I think the paragraphing needs some work). (talk) 11:02, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I left the Background section as you made it. Also note that I kept the redirect for Big Five since it is more practical to just go and edit the redirect in case the section changes its name. 〜イヴァンスクルージ九十八［IvanScrooge98］（会話） 11:13, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2022/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Passed MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 00:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Reviewer: MyCatIsAChonk (talk · contribs) 01:27, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) 01:27, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	~~Wikilink European Broadcasting Union under "At Eurovision"~~ ~~Interlanglink Fokas Evangelinos~~ Prose is clear of typos and understandable.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Complies with guidelines; the table integration for voting at the bottom is well-done and appropriate.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	References are properly formatted and placed in a 'References' section
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Most sources are from news sites like Eurovision Fun, ESCToday, or EBU; all of these are reliable.
	2c. it contains no original research.	Article is well-cited, no OR visible
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Earwig shows no violations/plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Article addresses the context of the contestm before the contest, at the contest, and voting results; all of these are appropriate.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	There's definitely opportunity to be too detailed here, but the article is quite well-summarized. Nicely done!
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	No bias visible.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	No recent edit wars.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	One image is labeled under CC. All the flagicons are good too.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	One image is appropriate and properly captioned.
	7. Overall assessment.

Grk1011 I am very impressed by this article, it's well done! See to my minor things above, and this will be ready for GA! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 14:55, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MyCatIsAChonk. Thank you for the review! I have made the changes you requested and performed a final copyedit. Please let me know if I missed anything! Grk1011 (talk) 17:21, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.