Jump to content

Talk:Great Coastal Gale of 2007

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

New info for expansion

[edit]

Snow

[edit]

It should be noted in this article that the first two waves of this three-wave (or "Three-Part Storm" as KOMO-TV described it, contained considerable amounts of snowfall which fell throughout the state. I live 10 miles north of Shelton and I measured seven inches of snow in my yard on Monday, December 1, and the next day another five inches of snow fell.

It wasn't just the rain that contributed to the severe record floods. You also had several areas experience nearly a foot of snow in the two waves prior to the "main wave" that arrived late in the evening on December 2nd (which continued into the mid-afternoon, early-evening hours of December 3rd). At my residence, at 4PM on December 2, it was still snowing lightly, and stopped at around 5. At 6:30, the temperature had jumped nearly 30 degrees, and by eight, we'd started seeing the first bands of extreme heavy rainfall.

All of that melting snow, the extreme rise in temperature, and the extreme amounts of rain are what contributed to the record floods the Pacific Northwest (especially the Skokomish River and Chehalis River in Washington) experienced.Srosenow 98 (talk) 09:42, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the information about the snow, as well as a summarized breakdown of the major events on both December 1st and December 2nd. I'm working on gathering sources of information for most of the content I've added.Srosenow 98 (talk) 08:31, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disaster declarations for Oregon

[edit]

Lincoln, Washington, and Polk counties have apparently been added to the disaster area designation, or at least they are getting state services and considered part of the affected area. This is original research--my agency is one of those coordinating relief efforts--but I believe this was decided yesterday. I'll see if I can find citations if somebody doesn't beat me to it. Katr67 (talk) 19:19, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw it printed somewhere, just don't recall where.Rvannatta (talk) 06:49, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Woodsen is a redlink community but seems like it deserves a page now that it is wiped out. DOGAMI has a good PDF file on its fate, but not sure of propriety of sticking in in somewhere: http://www.oregongeology.com/sub/Landslide/Woodson_DF_Dec2007c.pdf —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rvannatta (talkcontribs) 06:58, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New source: Weyerhaeuser released a report on the damage

[edit]

See here. -Pete (talk) 08:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AP article: Storms Reveal Secrets on Oregon's Coast -Pete (talk) 10:39, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Great Coastal Gale of 2007. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:24, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Great Coastal Gale of 2007. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:58, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Great Coastal Gale of 2007. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:54, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Great Coastal Gale of 2007. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:12, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]