Talk:Good Garage Scheme

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Coventry (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Coventry, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CoventryWikipedia:WikiProject CoventryTemplate:WikiProject CoventryCoventry articles

West Midlands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject West Midlands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of West Midlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.West MidlandsWikipedia:WikiProject West MidlandsTemplate:WikiProject West MidlandsWest Midlands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 November 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Star (classification)#Hotel classifications in Britain|AA star ratings for hotels]] The anchor (#Hotel classifications in Britain) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Constructive feedback request

Would like constructive feedback on this page regarding neutrality and advertisement. I have added some criticisms, but am unsure of what more I can do. -- Laurahuet 13:19, 5 March 2010

WP:COATRACK and this article

We have some problems here with the GGS (industry), (Government), and (Forte) coverage. The article as it is now is a combination of two topics - the discussed-but-not-implemented UK gov. scheme, and Forte's project which shares the same name. If the article is about voluntary quality-control schemes for UK garages, it needs to cover all such plans (I understand there are several). If the topic is Forte's scheme, then much of the "History" section about proposed government projects is not relevant, as the Forte Good Garage Scheme is not a version of those projects, and the reader will be misled. The Interior (Talk) 03:16, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote what the reliable sources presented about Good Garage Scheme. If the article was about voluntary quality-control schemes for UK garages, then it would have a different name because Bosch Car Service, Motor Codes, BSI kitemark, and several others that didn't make it into the article because they didn't fit the topic do not hold themselves out as "good garage" anything. None of the reliable sources asserted that "the Forte Good Garage Scheme is not a version of those projects" as you suggest. The one topic is about a series of same name automobile repair shop motoring schemes in the United Kingdom (UK), each of which aims to improve industry repair standards for the benefit of consumers. The reliable sources brought out connections between GGS (Government), (industry), and (Forte). Not including those connections or the chronological history behind GGS from 2000 to the present would leave out main information about the topic. I'm glad you like the picture of the guy from the Royle. I've posted requests around Wikipedia in hopes of getting more photos for the article. As an aside, I never heard of Beef gravy on French fried potatoes and fresh cheese curds (Poutine) mentioned on your page (or any combination of gravy, fries, and cheese curds). I'll put that on my list of things to try, right after haggis. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 04:16, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Good Garage Scheme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:33, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]