Talk:Glažuta, Loški Potok
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Mass graves
[edit]A recent edit removed sourced historical information about graves in Glažuta. If you believe the graves are not in Glažuta, please explain why. If you believe that the graves deserve a separate article, you are welcome to create one. Doremo (talk) 19:05, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- Look at the map. Grčarice is much bigger village and closer to the grave than Glažuta. Grave lies in Medvedjakov gozd, much more appropriate for describing graves. Better than writing about this things in Glažuta article, you should write about Mass graves in one article. Otherweis we can write only about graves around villages and believe me that there is much more of them, than just this one.--Grabyton (talk) 12:05, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Glažuta, Loški Potok. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140201194208/http://www.etno-muzej.si/files/etnolog/pdf/0354-0316_1_kundegraber_kocevje.pdf to http://www.etno-muzej.si/files/etnolog/pdf/0354-0316_1_kundegraber_kocevje.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:49, 9 March 2016 (UTC)