Talk:Gipton

Untitled

TALK GIPTON

Block quote

I FOR ONE WHO WAS BROUGHT UP IN GIPTON WOULDN'T CLASS IT AS A NO GO AREA THE AREA IS FINE AND THE TROUBLE THAT WE DO HAVE IS FROM YOUNG HOODIES AS THEY LIKE TO BE CALLED BUT EVEN THAT TO MY KNOWLEDGE IS CONSIDERABLY LESS THEN ANY OTHER COUNCIL ESTATE. IF YOU ASK ME THE WORST PLACE NOW IS HAREHILLS LANE YOU CANT MOVE FOR PEOPLE HANGING AROUND THE MINI BANKS ON THE LANE AND THE BOOKIES IT IS VERY INTIMIDATING AND IF YOU CARED TO TAKE A PROPER LOOK THEY ARE LESS HOODIES AND MORE TOWARDS THE LATER STAGES OF TEENAGE LIFE THAT ARE HANGING AROUND.

• The article now states that Gipton isn't a no-go area, however, Harehills isn't all that bad-a-place, and it certainlty isn't the worst in Leeds. Areas like Halton Moor, East End Park and Chapeltown are worse areas, and Gipton is considered far worse than Harehills. (unsigned comment)

• I think that talking about "the worst place in Leeds" isn't much good, as it's likely to change every month. The current article seems better than the old one in many respects. Epa101 19:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Gipton seems to have a connetation as being one of the worst areas in Leeds, whether this is true or not could be debated. Personally, I would say that neighbouring Seacroft is much worse. Gipton is worst towards the Southside, around Gipton Approach and Brander Road I would say. It's certainly troubled, but Seacroft and Halton Moot are far worse I would have said. Also this would depend on where you draw the border lines for Gipton, areas such as the Ambertons are sometimes refered to as both Gipton and Oakwood. Incedently to say Harehills 'isn't a bad place' is hardly encyclopedic text, and a blatant lie, being as it seems that every time I drive down Roundhay Road at night, either someone tries to jack the car or someone slams on infront of you at the Empire lights.Mtaylor848 (talk) 17:58, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Gipton/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

. Requires infobox Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates Requires copy edit for WP:MOS Keith D (talk) 11:24, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Last edited at 11:24, 1 July 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 16:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gipton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081013183640/http://www.giptonartscentre.org.uk/ to http://www.giptonartscentre.org.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:20, 30 November 2017 (UTC)