Talk:Galeed Strict Baptist Chapel, Brighton
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Galeed Strict Baptist Chapel, Brighton article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Galeed Strict Baptist Chapel, Brighton appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 March 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 20:49, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that so many people attended the golden jubilee celebrations for the pastor of Galeed Chapel (pictured) in Brighton in 1932, they had to be held in a different church?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Dorking
- Comment: Hook fact supported by several sources: Elleray (ref [32]), Chambers (ref [24]) and Hyde (ref [33]). Chambers expresses it most clearly: The chapel belonging to the Countess of Huntington's Connexion was obtained for the [jubilee] meetings, since Galeed was far too small, and it is estimated that 1,500 people gathered, filling the large building [the CoHC church] to capacity."
Created by Hassocks5489 (talk). Self-nominated at 23:52, 26 February 2021 (UTC).
- Article is long enough (13792 characters), new enough (created 26 February, nominated same day), and article is within policy (with AGF on offline sources)
- Hook is short enough, interesting, in the article, and well cited (AGF on offline source)
- Image is freely licenced (public domain), used in the article, and looks fine at low resolution
- QPQ done
- Overall, this nomination passes (AGF on offline sources), congratulations. Nice to see a great new article about a place in Brighton. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:46, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Christianity articles
- Low-importance Christianity articles
- C-Class Baptist work group articles
- Low-importance Baptist work group articles
- Baptist work group articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- C-Class Brighton articles
- Low-importance Brighton articles
- WikiProject Brighton articles
- C-Class Sussex-related articles
- Low-importance Sussex-related articles
- WikiProject Sussex articles
- C-Class Architecture articles
- Low-importance Architecture articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles