Talk:Fundamental ontology

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Continental / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics
	Continental philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Martin_Heidegger#Being|''being'']] Anchor Martin_Heidegger#Being links to a specific web page: Being. The anchor (#Being) has been deleted.
[[Martin_Heidegger#Dasein|Dasein]] Anchor Martin_Heidegger#Dasein links to a specific web page: Dasein. The anchor (#Dasein) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Older comments

I draw your attention to the fact that the important philosophical atricle of 'Fundamental ontology' exists in German and in Russian Wikipedias. / Sophioman (talk) 21:16, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added interlanguage links to the two articles. Black Falcon ^(Talk) 19:56, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NB

ontology ought to designate fundamental ontology is problematic. It assumes that an ontological analysis of Dasein can ; let alone ought to replace a general ontology. This is contra Heidegger who argues contra Descartes' dualistic ontology. Διοτιμα (talk) 18:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to "BACKGROUND" section

I added intro graph with one source.

I edited next three graphs for clarity. They had and still have, no sources (alas) and are lead-in to long H. quote (primary source). 2602:252:D6A:B2C0:6966:5179:627D:2D84 (talk) 01:25, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Still working this over as above & etc. Re-writing/ editing material that is unsourced is doubly doubtful, but I think I know originsl writer's intent. I can't really locate new sources with just a phone. 104.228.235.206 (talk) 18:30, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

recent edits

the material I added is (with current source note 2) now what Google highights about this article in a google search for FunOnt. Apart from couple of primary source notes, is only sourced material in this srticle. 104.228.235.206 (talk) 18:36, 30 December 2021 (UTC) Continuing my above comments, this article is still quite poor but I've added a fair number of sources 2602:252:D6A:B2C0:79F3:EA73:E11B:17C9 (talk) 15:40, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]