This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish cultureTemplate:WikiProject Jewish cultureJewish culture articles
I don't remember what bibliographies I saw specifically, but looking on Google Scholar it's pretty easy to find listings of reviews of the film: [2], extensive coverage in [3], and this primary source references a 1980s NYTimes review [4]. That's just the first page of Google Scholar results for the title. signed, Rosguilltalk02:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That third link refers to a NYT article about the film's subject, the Fraye Arbeter Shtime, not the film itself. The subject of the Abidor JSTOR article (#2) is the filmmakers themselves, which was where this article title previously redirected. There is at most one paragraph describing the background and a little critical commentary. Unless there are other extensive reviews in the vein of the single academic review (#1) from American Anthropology, we're still missing basic sources to justify a standalone article vs. covering within a section in an existing article czar14:42, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mk, I came across additional paywalled sources of unclear utility. I'm not opposed to merging this into the article about the filmmakers. signed, Rosguilltalk15:32, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
