Talk:Frasers Group
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Frasers Group article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1 |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Logo
[edit]This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The image needs to be provided. See below. |
- What I think should be changed:
The logo needs to be updated
- Why it should be changed:
The logo currently on this page is incorrect and out of date
- References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):
The correct logo is used on this website [1] PR21 (talk) 12:25, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
References
- ^ Frasers Group plc https://www.frasersgroupplc.com/.
{{cite web}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help)
- @PR21: Not done for now: Please provide the correct logo as an uploaded image and I am happy to switch it out for you. Please take care that you do so in a way that complies with the applicable copyright policies (if the logo is eligible for copyright); you can learn more at Wikipedia:Logos. Thanks and best, Blablubbs|talk 12:55, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Blablubbs: Thank you. Link to uploaded logo here: Hope this works? Best, PR21|talk 15:20, 10 March 2021 (GMT)
- @PR21:, that does indeed work, and I have made the change (see here), but you will have to apply correct copyright tags to the image on commons or it will be deleted in 7 days – I assume PD-textlogo would apply here. Best, Blablubbs|talk 12:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Can I also ask you to disclose the exact nature of your connection both here and on your userpage? See WP:COIDISCLOSEPAY. Thanks. Blablubbs|talk 12:27, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Blablubbs: Thank you. Link to uploaded logo here: Hope this works? Best, PR21|talk 15:20, 10 March 2021 (GMT)
Split?
[edit]Just a general idea not a formal proposal, but should a spin-off of Sports Direct, focusing on the brand and stores be considered? With FG being the corporate side? DankJae 15:27, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- I agree.
- Keep Sports Direct International and Frasers Group whilst finding a way of having two separate pages without too much of the same. Chamelion738 (talk) 10:51, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Moving Sports Direct to its own dedicated page.
[edit]With Sports Direct Internationals rebrand to Frasers Group and with Sports Direct no longer being the companies flagship I think we should consider moving the Sports Direct side to a separate page and anything Sports Direct International/Frasers Group remaining on the current page. Chamelion738 (talk) 20:38, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Brands articles
- High-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles
- C-Class company articles
- High-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- C-Class Derbyshire articles
- High-importance Derbyshire articles
- WikiProject Derbyshire articles
- C-Class Retailing articles
- High-importance Retailing articles
- WikiProject Retailing articles
- C-Class sports articles
- WikiProject Sports articles
- C-Class United Kingdom articles
- Mid-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
- Declined requested edits