Talk:Franklin Rosemont

Untitled

There is no reason to merge other pages with this. As far as I can determine, the only reason to merge any pages would be to prove some kind of point that Franklin Rosemont was the only significant participant in subjects of merged articles, but there hardly exists any evidence to support this. This is why I identified the merges as vandalism. --Daniel C. Boyer 13:43, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

All right, I'll try to work with you on this.

1. Please see Wikipedia:Vandalism for a discussion of what is and is not vandalism.
2. The purpose of the merge was to create an article with sufficient content, and to eliminate duplication. Prior to the merge, there was considerable duplication of content among these articles, and each of them was too short to stand on its own.
3. Rosemont would appear to be the major figure in the two organizations whose articles were redirected here, and I made every effort to retain the content of those articles.

The Uninvited Co., Inc. 17:29, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

Where you are getting this "appearance" from I don't know, but the major participation of Penelope Rosemont, Paul Garon et al. makes me wonder why you are saying this. --Daniel C. Boyer 18:43, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

Daniel, do you have a really good picture of Franklin Rosemont? I want to see it.Classicjupiter2 00:45, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

Death?

I can't find anything in a google search from reliable sources (a few blogs, but I don't think those are good to use for something as serious as this) regarding whether he has died. As such, I've removed that from the lead. I think any mention of it, should wait for good sources. Raven1977^{Talk to me}_{My edits} 04:46, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Celebrated

I deleted the word "celebrated" from the sentence "was a poet, artist, historian, street speaker". If that word doesn't appear in, say, Keats's profile, then there's no reason why it should appear here. It it also neither sourced nor neutral.Carnamagos (talk) 20:38, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Franklin Rosemont. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090422072647/http://www.counterpunch.org/rosemont04162009.html to http://www.counterpunch.org/rosemont04162009.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090422072647/http://www.counterpunch.org/rosemont04162009.html to http://www.counterpunch.org/rosemont04162009.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:55, 30 November 2017 (UTC)