Talk:Flunixin

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Veterinary medicine Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veterinary medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Veterinary medicine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veterinary medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Veterinary medicineTemplate:WikiProject Veterinary medicineVeterinary medicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Flunixin.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

xkcd

This page was linked to by xkcd. Just a heads up. 24.6.107.29 (talk) 22:46, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder why 24.6.107.29 (talk) 22:46, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Woosh. TricksterWolf (talk) 00:46, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment of the year Pozaeo (talk) 17:41, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hint: read the proprietary names. -- SheeEttin (talk) 05:57, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't exist anymore, but it used to at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flunixin&diff=699809857&oldid=699636271 2001:56A:71A5:3100:B198:B242:4B19:8503 (talk) 22:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First "citation needed" here: http://what-if.xkcd.com/141/

Guess that could be a new Popular Culture bit? 65.24.29.78 (talk) 01:03, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trade names

I removed the list of trade names because it was unreferenced and inconsistent with other sources. If anyone can find reliable sources for specific names, they can be added back in. ChemNerd (talk) 16:35, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Equine Medications source, which is listed in the references section but not used in any inline citations, lists "Banamine" and "Citation" as two of the common brand names. I don't have access to that particular book at the moment, so I can't see that page's full context. Perhaps the editor who originally added that content, Eventer, still has access to that book, and could provide some insight? Wrelwser43 (talk) 05:06, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I went through and found more up-to-date sources and deleted the book. I can find some reliable sources for specific trade names, but if that is inconsistent then I think it is fine to leave it out. Banamine redirects to this page anyway, so anyone searching for it will end up where they need to be. Unfortunately, the formatting is screwed up and I'm not completely sure what I did or how to fix it…Eventer (talk) 20:41, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]