Jump to content

Talk:Finding Nemo Submarine Voyage

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

20,000 Leagues Under the Sea

[edit]

I think the 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea section should be moved and expanded into its own article, as the attraction had many differences to Submarine Voyage. I don't know too much about the 20K attraction, so I can't expand it any more than it already is. --Lyght 00:01, September 7, 2005 (UTC)

Title Change...

[edit]

Did we have to change it to the new name of the attraction? We could of just kept it the normal name after all and had the eventual changes be part of it's own section, like in the Journey Into Imagination article... --FigmentJedi 20:36, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't like the title change, either, and think we should keep them as separate articles. The new ride is likely to be quite different from the old one. Elf | Talk 16:37, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Submarine Voyage is quite different then the new attraction. I believe there should be a article for SV, FNSV, 20k Florida, and 20k Tokyo.--Randomgbear 19:27, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've split between Finding Nemo Submarine Voyage and Submarine Voyage. I've also removed those pictures which won't apply to the new ride. I've kept the photo of the overview shot of the subs, because the same vehicles are going to be used so the new ride probably won't look much different, though a new photo should eventually be taken. Theshibboleth 03:20, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Elf | Talk 05:49, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now that a year has passed and we know more about the ride, should this be merged with the other Submarine article? SpikeJones 04:26, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sub Names

[edit]

A few months ago I was able to peek beyond the contruction wall and I noticed there were some subs near the loading area. These were the real subs, but they had what appeared to be cardboard and clingwrap covering them up. There was also a hint of the classic yellow color paint on parts of the subs, and also big numbers painted on the sides of them. One read 304, one was 303, one was 305, etc. This tells me that these numbers correspond to the subs' original names, perhaps they'll be keeping them!

Recycled Subs?

[edit]

Where is the source for the information about the old subs being re-used?

Yes, subs are reused with Electric Motors. (Interview with Kathy Mangum, Backstage Pass - Spring 2007) Tiggerjay 18:01, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adding 2 more seats to an already crowded sub?!?! People are alot bigger now days than when the old submarine first ran!

They gained the space by switching to electric motors. Tiggerjay 18:01, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I believe they also added one handicap seat at each end. I also vaguely remember hearing that the staircases were modified to allow for more room. -- Aladdin Boy (talk) 18:12, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spoiler Warning?

[edit]

I placed a spoiler warning above the "Voyage" section, as the section details the attraction's contents. Even though the article subject is non-fiction (the attraction does exist), it does tell a ficticious story (like a book or a movie) whose contents shouldn't be revealed as yet. The attraction hasn't even officially opened, for that matter! I think the warning is justified under the following section of Wikipedia's style guide: Such reasons should demonstrate that the spoiler tag does not diminish article quality, and that knowledge of the spoiler would substantially diminish many readers' or viewers' enjoyment of the work. The article is not compromised, and I'm sure many readers are future Disneyland guests who would like to discover what's in the attraction on their own, not by reading someone's take on it. If they don't care, it's here for them to read. If they do, they can skip the section and move on. They should know, at least, that if they read the section they'll know what happens. McDoobAU93 17:51, 9 June 2007 (UTC) Some people just don't understand that rides can have a fictitious storyline. I think its ok for many Disney rides and park films. There is a storyline there, and obviously its a work of fiction just like movies. I guess fictional story lines in rides just don't count. --blm07 04:50, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would appear the WP standard would be to omit the spoiler warning, since it is non-fiction. However, since it is based on fictional work, there is some merrit to your claim. Perhaps this should simply be placed to a 'quick vote' of people actively monitoring this page. That way we avoid an Edit War. Your through? Tiggerjay 05:03, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm all for a vote. My position, in a nutshell, is that certain theme park attractions (obviously not all) tell a story as a movie or novel will, and that the story should not be revealed. As a compromise, let's give it 3 months and then remove the spoiler warning.
McDoobAU93 12:43, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently this was resolved some time ago—but yes, as in film articles, the plots of themepark attractions are fully described on WP with no "spoiler" notices. It's up to each reader if they want to know the details; we can't coddle them. – AndyFielding (talk) 13:42, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline

[edit]

Now that the attraction has opened, I suggest removing the timeline as the information carries very little significance for encyclopedia entries. Tiggerjay 20:21, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Subnames

[edit]

I have removed the subnames because they have been constantly changed over the last several weeks. We should hold back on this list until we can have a confirmed, finalized list of the sub names. Tiggerjay 23:16, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, you mean "sub names". For a moment, I thought you were referring to something that had secondary (sub-) names. – AndyFielding (talk) 13:44, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Fnsvposter.jpg

[edit]

Image:Fnsvposter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:44, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New image

[edit]

Can someone find a more recent photo of the Finding nemo Submarine voyage — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.23.168.217 (talk) 18:09, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Attention, there is no closed for this Atrraction — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antoniopadillarocks (talk • contribs) 14:29, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Finding Nemo Submarine Voyage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Finding Nemo Submarine Voyage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:59, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Finding Nemo Submarine Voyage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:03, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tech details?

[edit]

No discussion of the projection technology that makes this ride so convincing? Are the details still not public knowledge, or is there some stigma about revealing such things? Many WP articles discuss technical details of effects in movies, and even other Disney attractions. – AndyFielding (talk) 12:36, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody? – AndyFielding (talk) 13:45, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Finding_Nemo_Submarine_Voyage&oldid=1198623887"