Talk:Feminist language reform

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 19 September 2015 by reviewer SwisterTwister (talk · contribs).

Feminism

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Section sizes

Section size for Feminist language reform (13 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	1,857	1,857
History	9,876	21,942
Switzerland	3,657	3,657
French	2,240	2,240
English	3,390	5,622
Australian English	2,232	2,232
Spanish	547	547
Theory	5,848	5,848
Implementation	1,022	1,022
Criticism	980	980
See also	327	327
References	30	30
Further reading	399	399
Total	32,405	32,405

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment in Spring 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nazarian17.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 August 2020 and 23 November 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cdowney44.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 22 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Skmpark. Peer reviewers: Nish0912, Andreaplascencia.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Information being considered for this article - Gendered pronouns and meaning - https://www.jstor.org/stable/42887784?seq=1#references_tab_contents

Grammar and gender - https://www.jstor.org/stable/43103759

Women's representation - https://books.google.com/books?id=cM-wCwAAQBAJ&lpg=PR6&ots=f8HGsNXh8r&dq=feminism%20and%20linguistic%20theory&lr&pg=PA6#v=onepage&q=feminism%20and%20linguistic%20theory&f=false —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdowney44 (talk • contribs) 00:02, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Critisism

I feel this needs a criticism section. I can try to find sources later — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2620:1D5:EF:2:0:0:0:61 (talk) 18:20, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Needs discussion of recent additions to well known dictionaries from feminism

"mansplain", example of a negative word describing men which comes from feminism. — 2600:1700:d591:5f10:74e0:c0d2:5220:74ad (talk) 04:23, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

This article “Feminist Language Reform” is rated as a Start Class article, a preliminary article with plenty of room for improvement, with a completeness score of 61, a rating that I agree with. Some strengths of this article are that it provides a great introduction into the realm of Feminist language and the reform surrounding it. This article does a great job at providing a sufficient history of language reform with a few country specific examples to really drive the point home. It also explains the theory of feminist language planning in a concise and easy to understand manner. One way this article could be improved is to maybe add more for the implementation section. It may be helpful to provide examples for each of the four stages of feminist language planning or to provide an example of one aspect of feminist language planning that has gone through all four steps. There is also a lot of text in each section, so it may be useful to place more pictures throughout the article in order to break up the long paragraphs. Overall, I believe that article can classified as very close to being completely well-developed due to its strong base and thoroughly fleshed out examples. Hope this was helpful & good luck! — Nish0912 (talk) 04:30, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

links

https://changingminds.org/explanations/gender/womens_language.htm — a linguistic theory reaction? in which direction?
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-language

— Arlo James Barnes 05:41, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]