User talk:Nish0912
| This user is a student editor in Rice_University/Gender_and_Politics_(Fall_2021) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Nish0912, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:31, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:FeministPoliticalTheorySymbol.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:FeministPoliticalTheorySymbol.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:32, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]The article “Feminist Political Theory” is rated as a Start-class article of ‘high-importance’ by several wikiprojects and I agree that this article provides a good base for improvements and expanding on ideas. Each section could definitely undergo more in-depth statements and context for the different thoughts within feminist political theory (FPT). The article’s strengths include its strong structure because of the ease at which you can research those specific categories of FPT and easily incorporate those details into their respective sections to construct a more thorough article. The article can use improvements in its detail regarding the different thoughts of FPT, and this should be relatively easily because of its foundation. These detailed sections very curtly summarize the political theories, not entirely doing justice in its explanations of the theories, like the ‘Postmodernist feminist’ section. What exactly does “pick and mix” identities mean? Clarification in small things like this can really improve the article. Taking out the parts when “we” or “our” is said will also aid in neutralizing the article, as well as including time periods when these specific FPTs were created or became popular would help. The article has room to become a more comprehensive and developed article.
Hope this helps!! Best wishes on your article!