Talk:Farsley

Yorkshire Mid‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Farsley is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Leeds

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Leeds, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Leeds on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LeedsWikipedia:WikiProject LeedsTemplate:WikiProject LeedsLeeds articles

What doing?

Just a note of what I am doing over the next couple of days whilst the inuse tag is up top.

Adding an infobox
Breaking the page up into appropriate sections
Embelishing detail on each subject
Adding appropriate images
Citing references for new and existing information

Mtaylor848 (talk) 21:58, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question

What was with all the cloth dummies up and down Farsley Town Street yesterday morning (30/09/13) - some kind of local festival? MFlet1 (talk) 12:21, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Farsley/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

Requires infobox
Requires photographs
Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
Requires copy edit for WP:MOS

Keith D (talk) 14:24, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 14:24, 25 February 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 14:58, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Farsley

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Farsley's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "2011 census":

From Cullingworth: UK Census (2011). "Local Area Report – Cullingworth Parish (E04000158)". Nomis. Office for National Statistics. Retrieved 22 February 2020.
From Woolley, West Yorkshire: UK Census (2011). "Local Area Report – Woolley Parish (1170211048)". Nomis. Office for National Statistics. Retrieved 1 December 2018.
From Meltham: UK Census (2011). "Local Area Report – Meltham Parish (E04012087)". Nomis. Office for National Statistics. Retrieved 20 July 2021.
From Pudsey: UK Census (2011). "Local Area Report – Pudsey Ward (as of 2011) (1237321094)". Nomis. Office for National Statistics. Retrieved 1 October 2018.
From Otley: UK Census (2011). "Local Area Report – Otley Parish (E04000204)". Nomis. Office for National Statistics. Retrieved 6 April 2019.
From Calverley: UK Census (2011). "Local Area Report – Calverley and Farsley Ward (as of 2011) (E05001418)". Nomis. Office for National Statistics. Retrieved 7 June 2019.
From Heptonstall: UK Census (2011). "Local Area Report – Heptonstall parish (E04000177)". Nomis. Office for National Statistics. Retrieved 10 May 2022.
From Garforth: UK Census (2011). "Local Area Report – Garforth and Swillington Ward (as of 2011) (1237321079)". Nomis. Office for National Statistics. Retrieved 1 October 2018.
From Cleckheaton: UK Census (2011). "Local Area Report – Cleckheaton Ward (as of 2011) (E05001393)". Nomis. Office for National Statistics. Retrieved 23 November 2021.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]