Jump to content

Talk:Far from the Tree (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleFar from the Tree (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 13, 2022Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Far from the Tree (film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kaleeb18 (talk · contribs) 14:17, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well this makes me so sad. I reviewed the entire article, and while I had another tab open that I was looking at I came back to this one and the page refreshed so now I must redo the entire review :( ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 14:17, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

...relatable Pamzeis (talk) 15:04, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

[edit]
  • There is not much in the lead that talk about the producion section of the article
    • plus Added
  • The infobox says the music was done by Nami Melumad, but I do not see that anywhere in the article
    • ...because there's nowhere else to put it? There is no coverage of her work on the short
      • Then shouldn’t there be a RS backing that up?
        • Well, the film's credits already serve as the WP:PRIMARY source for the information
  • I feel like the November 24, 2021, release date in the infobox should also have something with parenthesis around it saying something like theatrical release
    • Why, though...
      • Well, if I’m the reader I guess I would want to know what the second release was for. Or maybe I’m just dumb and should know the second release means theatrical.
        • Well, according to {{Film date}}, it's for the locations... and there's a discussion somewhere that says it should not include the location if it was the location in which the film was produced
  • Also is English really needed in the infobox, because the character do not even talk
  • listening to the ocean waves in it – I would put ocean wave noises so it does not sound like there are ocean waves in the seashell
    •  Done
  • angrily scolds her for leaving, pointing out his scar – this sounds like the father is talking to the coyote
    •  Fixed
  • who acts much as she did – as much as?
    •  Fixed
  • research trip to Canon Beach. – I would add Canon Beach, Oregon.
    •  Done
  • Nourigat noted the abundance of raccoons in their natural habitat while on a research trip to Canon Beach. She immediately considered them as the short's main characters. – These two sentences can be combined
    •  Done
  • and story artist, respectively. – respectively is not needed
    • Needed to clarify one was a production supervisor and one was a story artist, not that they were both of these or something
      • Gotcha
  • Disney's Meander drawing system – If Disney's Meander refers to meander (art), I think meander should link to that. But idk if it is referring to that since I have no clue what Disney's Meander is
    • Don't think so, reading the linked article
  • simple accessory but ended – comma before but
  • released alongside theatrical screenings Encanto – of Encanto
    •  Done
  • received positive response – is it supposed to be responses? you could also maybe say a positive response
    •  Fixed
  • Romper stated it – should be a that after stated unless the quotation marks were just forgotten
    •  Done
  • considering it have some of – to have
    •  Done
  • Maybe you can use an image of Cannon Beach in production so readers can see what it look likes compared to the short

Well, that's it for my review. This is just my two cents, but if your looking for a DYK hook you could create one based off how the raccoons were originally going to be humans, cause that was interesting. ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 16:50, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright I think the article is ready to pass the review. ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 13:08, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed