Talk:Ethical omnivorism

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Philosophy: Ethics Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics

This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Veganism and Vegetarianism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neutral?

Seems like the article was written specifically to point out how bad ethical omnivorism is. As in, maybe 75% of the article is calling it a stupid concept and a pie-in-the-sky idea. I'm not really sure if this article can be neutralized without reducing it to the first two sentences.

104.32.108.132 (talk) 18:37, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Based on your reasoning you clearly do not understand what neutral means. If something is stupid by then the neutral thing is indeed to call it stupid and a "balanced" view would be heavily biased. For example regarding homeopathy it is neutral for the article to portray it as hogwash. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.229.18.81 (talk) 09:02, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Implying that ethnical omnivorism is indeed "stupid", which is a personal opinion. Of course vegans would disagree with it. It's as if we cited – only! – the opinion of conservatives about the Labour Party, or socialists about the Tories. But vegans have no monopoly on ethical living (more precisely: attempts to live ethically), regardless of how much they might insist that their way is the only way. Vegans (or their thought leaders) and the international community of scientists are two completely different groups. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 22:06, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do think the way the article is now though, there's no content about the other sides. So I'd like more of that in there, as someone curious about this subject! Likeanechointheforest (talk) 21:01, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Response?

This is a pretty small page. I think it would make sense for it to have inclusion of coverage of all angles, both in favor, and against, as well as those that are neutral. Likeanechointheforest (talk) 21:00, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]