User talk:Likeanechointheforest

Likeanechointheforest, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Likeanechointheforest! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi Likeanechointheforest! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! ⇒ Lucie Person (talk|contribs) 21:01, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

  Thank you! Likeanechointheforest (talk) 08:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

February 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Stop adding {{See also}} to pages of suicides. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not dedicated to suicide prevention Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 08:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

@DatGuy:: Hi, my apologies for my edits! I was trying to be helpful, definitely didn't think that what I was doing was vandalism! I was going off of a discussion in the talk page for the Wikipedia article on Suicide, where someone suggested adding these see also tags. I agreed and when no one else wrote anything after that, took that as a sign that it would be okay! I would still argue for the necessity of adding these entries to Wikipedia, but will defer to your judgement. Likeanechointheforest (talk) 06:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Powers (doctor) (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:William Powers (doctor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:William Powers (doctor), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 21:46, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Powers (doctor) (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tom (LT) was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:William Powers (doctor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:William Powers (doctor), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tom (LT) (talk) 10:10, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Will Powers (doctor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Will Powers (doctor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Will Powers (doctor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 00:02, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Likeanechointheforest. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Will Powers (doctor), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Spicy (talk) 17:44, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Possible areas for editing

Hi Likeanechointheforest,

I just commented on the AFD about the article you created, and I thought I would leave a note here; while I don't believe that the individual that article covers is notable, your stated goals for creating it are commendable. To help you meet them, could I suggest that you take a look at this WikiProject, WP:LGBT? You'll find a community of editors there dedicated to improving the coverage of LGBT topics, as well as hints on where you can contribute edits.

In particular, I would recommend looking at "Editing" tab, and then the start class articles. I can't guarantee that they all meet wikipedia's standards of notability, but they are likely to, and they are all in need of further development.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me!

BilledMammal (talk) 22:34, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! I will definitely do that! Likeanechointheforest (talk) 20:56, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

edit to Disclosure:_Trans_Lives_on_Screen

Hello! I reverted your edit to Disclosure:_Trans_Lives_on_Screen. You added a red link to the See Also section. You should create an article for Monsters in the Closet first. Also, be sure to use edit summaries with every edit: they are very helpful. Cheers! Doctormatt (talk) 23:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Domesday Book, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doomsday.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Edit summary

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.

Thanks! Fettlemap (talk) 20:34, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

- Okay! Yeah, I never know what to say and saw a lot of people leaving them blank, but thanks for that reference guide. I'll try to come up with stuff now. Likeanechointheforest (talk) 20:29, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:William Powers (physician)

Hello, Likeanechointheforest. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:William Powers (physician), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Uber Eats

I reverted your edit to Uber Eats because you did not cite it (WP:CITE, WP:RS). I have little doubt that you are correct, but it does need a citation I'm afraid. --Yamla (talk) 20:19, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Got it, thanks! I thought it was in the body of the page itself but I'll be more diligent Likeanechointheforest (talk) 18:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Selfstudier (talk) 09:26, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Farmingdale High School

Notability is only of concern when deciding if something warrants an article. An incident does not need to be notable itself to warrant inclusion in an article. A fatal bus crash on a school outing is certainly worth mentioning, Meters (talk) 01:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

I always thought notability meant there had to be both sources for the thing itself and sources that explained why it was important to the article. I also thought that single incidents were typically not notable enough for inclusion on pages. Would you happen to have links to essays/policies on these topics that reflect where I'm wrong? Genuinely, I would appreciate knowing. Likeanechointheforest (talk) 23:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Read WP:N ("notability is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article.") and particularly WP:NNC {"The notability guideline does not apply to the contents of articles."). Content does have to be verifiable, but that is not the same as being notable. Meters (talk) 00:15, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! Likeanechointheforest (talk) 16:11, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Dowa Holdings

Hi Likeanechointheforest, thanks again for your work on Dowa Holdings. I have recently posted additional suggestions for the article and seemed to have inadvertently misspelled your username in the ping so you likely didn't see it. I would appreciate if you could review and assist with the requests. Thanks so much, Yamadori1 (talk) 11:30, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dowa Holdings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guanajuato, Mexico.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:05, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

My COI Request for Cohen Milstein

Hi there! A month and a half ago, you asked if I had additional sources to substantiate a COI request I made for Cohen Milstein. With apologies for the delay, I just responded. Since my response doesn't seem to have pinged you, I thought I'd notify you here. :) If you have the time, I'd be grateful for your thoughts. Thanks a ton! Signed, BlueRoses13 (talk) 02:46, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The No Spam Barnstar
	For your contributions fighting promotional content on Feastables نوحفث   Let's Chat! 00:05, 21 October 2024 (UTC)