Jump to content

Talk:Elisabeth Anderson Sierra

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk02:39, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Created by RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) and Njoy deep (talk). Nominated by RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) at 02:46, 24 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Elisabeth Anderson Sierra; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Given how time consuming this process is, this woman deserves a Medal of Freedom, if not a Nobel for Physiology! When I saw the actual number my mouth hung open, and would suggest an ALT that includes it. 1500 litres? Gebus! Anyway, new enough, long enough, hook directly cited and QPQ complete. I'm guessing this is going on the all-time list. Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:33, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @RAJIVVASUDEV, Njoy deep, and Maury Markowitz: Interesting condition and hook. The article is a purported biography but it is focussed entirely on her condition and world record, omitting details about her life. It would be nice to know her birth year? If we know it we need Category:1960 births or Category:Birth year missing. I think part of the lead should be moved to perhaps a "background section" or "early life". The lead should introduce what the article is about rather than presenting cited information which is only in the lead and not in the body. MOS:LEADCITE. Not necessary but you might also consider adding an image from commons to the article, maybe of the type breast pump. I am not sure we should name her minor children "Isabella, Sophia" but if we do it should be cited and right now it is not in the article cited; only in the infobox. Bruxton (talk) 20:06, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Bruxton: I appreciate your comments; I have tried to fix those things. Kindly have a look. Thanks RV (talk) 02:33, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


The {{Peacock}} tag

[edit]

I rephrased/removed several of the peacocks within the article. There might be baby peacocks here and there, though, so I'll keep the tag (originally added by Numberguy6) there. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 01:25, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any statement which is not factual? I do not see the justification for the tag as the article is now worded. Kablammo (talk) 17:39, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]