Jump to content

Talk:El Tatio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleEl Tatio is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 3, 2021.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 9, 2018Good article nomineeListed
October 9, 2021Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 27, 2018.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that El Tatio (pictured) is the largest geyser field in the southern hemisphere and one of two worldwide with the highest elevation?
Current status: Featured article

Sources needing discussion

[edit]
  • [1], Frontiers is a slightly dodgy publisher.
  • [2], press release, may be useful to indicate that there are concerns about impacts that drilling in Bolivia may have on El Tatio.
  • [3], which mentions native-government collaboration.
  • [4], for the number of bacterial species.

Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:33, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also:
  • [5] for a mineral deposit.
  • [6], for one of the earliest studies on this field.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:06, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Magnetotelluric analysis and more Frontiers stuff Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:13, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This book might need mining but about a mythological importance of Tatio seems to be a bit unusual. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:59, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IUGS 100 mention

[edit]

I think that this is a bit too much information on one particular listing. The IUGS 100 sites listing isn't very widely reported upon, I don't see why it needs a dedicated paragraph when other listings here don't need one. The source itself has little additional information for the article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:54, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's but two sentences at the end of a long article - I think the fact that the lead international body in the discipline has chosen the site as one of its top 100 is notable. But by all means move mention of it to elsewhere in the article if more appropriate. Geopersona (talk) 19:44, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've done so. I think if we get more commentary (probably in 2023) about this listing, then it can be expanded. As is though there isn't enough information for an entire paragraph. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:32, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PNUD

[edit]

What organization is PNUD in this source? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:06, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Free use by indigenous communities

[edit]

I presume this article is too local interest to be worth mentioning? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]