Talk:El Tatio
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the El Tatio article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
El Tatio is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 3, 2021. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 27, 2018. | |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Sources needing discussion
[edit]- [1], Frontiers is a slightly dodgy publisher.
- [2], press release, may be useful to indicate that there are concerns about impacts that drilling in Bolivia may have on El Tatio.
- [3], which mentions native-government collaboration.
- [4], for the number of bacterial species.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:33, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Also:
- Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:06, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- Magnetotelluric analysis and more Frontiers stuff Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:13, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- This book might need mining but about a mythological importance of Tatio seems to be a bit unusual. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:59, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
- Magnetotelluric analysis and more Frontiers stuff Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:13, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
IUGS 100 mention
[edit]I think that this is a bit too much information on one particular listing. The IUGS 100 sites listing isn't very widely reported upon, I don't see why it needs a dedicated paragraph when other listings here don't need one. The source itself has little additional information for the article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:54, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- It's but two sentences at the end of a long article - I think the fact that the lead international body in the discipline has chosen the site as one of its top 100 is notable. But by all means move mention of it to elsewhere in the article if more appropriate. Geopersona (talk) 19:44, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- I've done so. I think if we get more commentary (probably in 2023) about this listing, then it can be expanded. As is though there isn't enough information for an entire paragraph. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:32, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are featured articles
- FA-Class Chile articles
- High-importance Chile articles
- WikiProject Chile articles
- FA-Class WikiProject Volcanoes articles
- High-importance WikiProject Volcanoes articles
- All WikiProject Volcanoes pages