Talk:Edgar J. Kaufmann Conference Center

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Edgar J. Kaufmann Conference Center appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 December 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that New York City would not allow a forest in the Edgar J. Kaufmann Conference Center?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Edgar J. Kaufmann Conference Center.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 04:01, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Edgar J. Kaufmann Conference Center

... that the Edgar J. Kaufmann Conference Center was Finnish architect Alvar Aalto's only design in New York City? Source: Iovine, Julie V. (September 14, 2000). "Aalto Room May Be Shown the Door". The New York Times.
- ALT1: ... that the design elements for New York City's Edgar J. Kaufmann Conference Center were largely made in Finland? Source: Stern, Robert A. M.; Mellins, Thomas; Fishman, David (1995). New York 1960: Architecture and Urbanism Between the Second World War and the Bicentennial. New York: Monacelli Press. pp. 629, 630.
- ALT2: ... that it took Alvar Aalto half a year to design a filter for a chandelier in the Edgar J. Kaufmann Conference Center? Source: "Aalto in New York" (PDF). Progressive Architecture. Vol. 46. February 1965. p. 184.
- ALT3: ... that Alvar Aalto wanted a "forest" in the Edgar J. Kaufmann Conference Center but could not do so because of New York City government regulations? Source: "Architecture: Alvar Aalto, Finnish Master, Represented Here; Rooms He Designed to Be Unveiled Today". The New York Times. November 30, 1964.
- ALT4: ... that the New York City government would not allow a forest in the Edgar J. Kaufmann Conference Center? Source: "Architecture: Alvar Aalto, Finnish Master, Represented Here; Rooms He Designed to Be Unveiled Today". The New York Times. November 30, 1964.
- ALT5: ... that although one architectural critic said "a landmark is gained" with the completion of the Edgar J. Kaufmann Conference Center, it was rejected as a New York City landmark? Source: "Architecture: Alvar Aalto, Finnish Master, Represented Here; Rooms He Designed to Be Unveiled Today". The New York Times. November 30, 1964; "7 Theaters on 42nd Street Fail to Make Cut for Landmark Consideration". DNAinfo New York.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Wilhelm Werner

Created by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 16:40, 22 November 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Epicgenius: Good article. Hook is interesting, article is sourced, and the QPQ is done. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:13, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]