Talk:East Bay Green Corridor

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

It is requested that an image or photograph of East Bay Green Corridor be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Alameda County, California may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Article

Great job so far. I've gone in an made just a few edits, so take a look. My initial impression is that it's quite good, although there may be a bit too much detail in here (such as the long list of cities/entities with who represented them at a meeting). It isn't that this detail is bad or wrong, but I'm not sure it's entirely appropriate for an encyclopedia article, which should really just hit the highlights. A list of the cities may suffice just as well. There is also a tendency here for people to get very recalcitrant if they believe that you are pressing some kind of corporate or political agenda on behalf of a person or entity and when something is tainted with that notion people can dig their heels in against even small things. Whether you are or aren't involved with the corridor, I would recommend taking this kind of advice to heart just in case you run into someone who questions the level of detail here and the motivations for it. Otherwise, I would just recommend that you fill out full citations for the items that have web links, using the cite news template. (I can help you with that.) A great first effort. — e. ripley\^talk 02:17, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for the feedback and the helpful edits! I wasn't sure how much to include, so I think I erred on the side of too much - you seem to have taken out everything I was on the fence about! I included the list of representatives for the founding members because most of them are very prominent and important people themselves. For instance, the signer for LBNL was Steven Chu, who is the current Secretary of Energy. I tried to work that fact in later, because I think it is actually fairly important to the context of the corridor - having the vocal support of the Secretary of Energy has given the corridor much added clout. I see that you cut that sentence... is there a better way to work the info in? Or should I just leave it out entirely? I don't mean it in a promotional way, just as context. Of the six original signers, five are notable enough to already have articles, and several of them are very important locally, especially Dellums, who is something of legend in these parts. I didn't include the signers for the members that joined later, because none of them were notable themselves. Thanks again for your great help! Tarastar42 (talk) 03:13, 22 June 2010 (UTC)Tarastar42[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on East Bay Green Corridor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111213203739/http://www.edab.org/east_bay_economic_development_alliance/index.htm to http://www.edab.org/east_bay_economic_development_alliance/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:32, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]