Talk:EE (telecommunications)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the EE (telecommunications) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 6 months

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Telecommunications Low‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[IOS 11#11.3|iOS 11.3]] The anchor (#11.3) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Town or city missing in coverage additions

I noticed that the total number towns/cities of the first 4 lists (October to February inclusive) do not equal the 4th total of 37 cited in the ‘the next web’ article.

11 +7 +9 +9 = 36 ≠ 37

However, the first 3 lists add up to the 3rd total of 27 cited in the TechRadar article.

11 +7 +9 = 27

So it seems that there was a town or city added in January or February that is on neither the 3rd or 4th lists.

—James Haigh (talk) 2013-04-18T19:46:02Z

One more requested move

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 06:40, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

EE (telecommunications company) → EE Limited – Use of the company type as natural disambiguation is not a new concept, see also BlackBerry Limited. --Relisted. Dekimasuよ! 02:26, 2 November 2014 (UTC) ViperSnake151 Talk 02:49, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~~You mean~~ What about EE Ltd? Wow, I assumed that "BlackBerry Limited" is a phone brand, not a company. --George Ho (talk) 03:10, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They used to be called Research in Motion. But yeah, either is fine. Our infobox actually does use "Limited" so that's what I went by. ViperSnake151 Talk 16:50, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support, per nom. Natural disambiguation would also be more WP:CONCISE in this case. bd2412 T 16:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Love the info, hate the title....,....

I think that you should edit many things, such as the titles, they need to be better! For instance to say something like the definition of something to do with dogs, just simple, make it fun like this, Woof Woof!! who knew that when dogs shed they are nervous!!

--50.32.107.46 (talk) 00:18, 7 November 2014 (UTC)LOVER of wiki user12[reply]

Everything Everywhere

The original name of the business was Everything Everywhere Limited, this should be included in the beginning of the article. For some reason an IP keeps on deleting this. Steven (Editor) (talk) your input would be useful as you have also reverted the IP. --Devokewater (talk) 18:36, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Devokewater I agree with everything you have said, Everything Everywhere is the original name and should be mentioned in the beginning of the article Steven (Editor) (talk) 23:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support also. Readers will want to know the meaning behind the initials, and the intro is short enough to include this. --Wire723 (talk) 10:26, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Major update needed

This article needs to be majorly updated in terms of structure and recent changes, I can't do them all my self obviously and it doesn't seem like there's a push to fix the issue as of now. Professional Adriazeri (talk) 00:22, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]