Talk:Dysphania pusilla
Appearance
A fact from Dysphania pusilla appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 October 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
uses?
[edit]uses?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 17:21, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- I use full sentences when I ask a question. One of the benefits of doing so is that others understand what I'm asking. Schwede66 18:36, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Proposed correction (request expert confirmation)
[edit]The text currently reads "The herb is distinguishable from other species (such as the introduced Cordyline pumilio)"
Yes, it certainly is distinguishable :). I wonder if that was intended to read "... such as the introduced Dysphania (or Chenopodium) pumilio".
- Thank you for your notice. As a comparation with Cordyline makes no sense here, this is surely an error. I will change the text to Dysphania pumilio. Kind regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 11:33, 20 May 2019 (UTC)