Talk:Dreamscaperers

Dreamscaperers was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (August 26, 2013). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dreamscaperers article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation: American Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been selected for use on the Animation portal.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Gravity Falls#Main|Grunkle Stan]] The anchor (#Main) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[Gravity Falls#Antagonists|Gideon]] The anchor (#Antagonists) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[Gravity Falls#Main|Soos]] The anchor (#Main) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[Gravity Falls#Recurring|Bill Cipher]] The anchor (#Recurring) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Dreamscaperers/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Taylor Trescott (talk · contribs) 20:22, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will look. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 20:22, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Afraid I'm gonna have to fail this one. The prose is clunky and I saw right off the bat that the article uses lots of unreliable sources. TV.com, IMDB, TV Tropes, and Zimbio.com to name a few.

Two notes:

During the scene where Bill is summoned he strikes out a number of images on his body, like John F. Kennedy, UFOs, the Aztec calendar, the Apollo moon landing, Stonehenge, Giza pyramids, crop circles, etc. continuing the show's scoffing of conspiracy theories. Original research. You can't cite the episode for something that happens in it. The Variety link at the end doesn't mention this episode at all.
The episode got a 9.8 user rating on TV.com and 5 stars on Zimbio. It also received 4 stars general rating on Common Sense Media and 8.4/10 from the Internet Movie Database. Not reliable sources.

Better luck next time. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 20:39, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]