This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was created or improved during the Stub contest hosted by the Women in Red project from October to December 2019. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Hello, it looks like you are attempting to make changes to the Dorothy Moon article on Wikipedia, specifically the designation of her being labeled as "far right." Normally I'm opposed to labeling politicians and other individuals with those titles, but she has been named as a far right/radical individual by many publications (see the citations of the article). A journalist put their credibility on the line to address this, and more than one has done this. You are seeking to change her status as a "far right" politician to a right-wing or something... here's the problem. The "far right" label is sourced. The contention that you have is not with Wikipedia or certain users here, it's with the journalists who decided to name her as a far-right Republican. You need to take issue with them, and not continue to change the same thing on the same article every few days. That label isn't going anywhere. Please let me know if I can be of assistance to you. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 21:56, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Far-Right has a definition. Dorothy Moon does not meet that definition of Far-Right, and it sounds like you are not willing to discuss it.
From Wikipedia's page on Far-Right:
"Historically used to describe the experiences of Fascism, Nazism, and Falangism, far-right politics now include neo-fascism, neo-Nazism, the Third Position, the alt-right, racial supremacism, National Bolshevism (culturally only) and other ideologies or organizations that feature aspects of authoritarian, ultra-nationalist, chauvinist, xenophobic, theocratic, racist, homophobic, transphobic, and/or reactionary views." Taxmiester (talk) 14:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Far-Right has a definition. Dorothy Moon does not meet the definition of Far-Right, and it sounds like the editor is not willing to discuss it. Dorothy is simply farther right of the center line than the left would like. The sourced material is all op-ed pieces with the authors using Far-Right hyperbole to make a point, and should not be enough to label Dorothy Moon Far-Right or extremist.
From Wikipedia's page on Far-Right:
"Historically used to describe the experiences of Fascism, Nazism, and Falangism, far-right politics now include neo-fascism, neo-Nazism, the Third Position, the alt-right, racial supremacism, National Bolshevism (culturally only) and other ideologies or organizations that feature aspects of authoritarian, ultra-nationalist, chauvinist, xenophobic, theocratic, racist, homophobic, transphobic, and/or reactionary views." Taxmiester (talk) 14:38, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As for your cites:
1 – Is and opinion piece that calls John Birch Society a Far-Right Organization. They are not Racist Neo-Nazis. This article was written by left-wing journalist and is an opinion piece, it is no surprise they are spreading so much misinformation. The use of far-right to describe them is pure political hyperbole and nothing more.
2 – Another opinion piece written by a democrat using hyperbole to make his point.
3 – Does not link to the article referenced.
4 – Does not even mention Dorothy Moon in the political op-ed.
None of these articles show how these Republicans are linked to the Far-Right. The left makes statements using hyperbole but never connect the dots. Far-Right has a definition that these politicians, including Ms. Moon, do not rise to. Taxmiester (talk) 23:49, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, the citations discussed above are:
David Smith, 'Republican and more Republican': Idaho shifts ever rightward, The Guardian (May 11, 2022): "elections for other offices of state are more competitive between the hard right and harder right. ... Dorothy Moon, a member of the far-right John Birch Society, is a contender for secretary of state."
James Dawson, Idaho Gov. Brad Little wins GOP primary over Trump's pick, Lt. Gov. Janice McGeachin, Boise State Public Radio News (May 17, 2022): "Other far-right candidates are following McGeachin's lead by seeking statewide office in the Republican Party primary. ... Two state lawmakers, Dorothy Moon and Mary Souza, who both falsely insist that President Biden lost the 2020 presidential election, want to become Idaho secretary of state."
As the reliability of the sources and the neutrality of the statement are currently disputed, I'm removing the term "far-right" from the article's first sentence. It should only be restored if a consensus to restore it is found in the RfC below (cf. WP:BLPRESTORE). ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:34, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, pretty evidently. To be frank, the concerns raised by the WP:SPA (literally only registered in order to make this edit and having only made edits to this page or complaining about this page) are see-through and frivolous - complaining about the journalists of the articles being "left-wing" or "Democrats" rather than engaging with content. An abundance of sources describe her as far-right or having ties to far right (similar to what's displayed in the lede for Marjorie Taylor Greene's page, as shown in the lede - for example, the four in the lede ([1][2][3][4]) and then 5, 6, 7, 8 (from a WP:RSP), 9, 10, 11, 12.. I could go on. ser!(chat to me - see my edits)18:35, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but the first sentence should not. It's just bad writing. I've answered multiple RfC's today where somebody was putting something in the first sentence, typically criticism. The answer to that is pretty much always "no". Adoring nanny (talk) 18:21, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but the first sentence should not. Gotta ditto this. Principally, she is an American politician who serves as a Republican member of Idaho House of Representatives. Period. She has been described as far right. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 19:25, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
^David Smith, 'Republican and more Republican': Idaho shifts ever rightward, The Guardian (May 11, 2022): "elections for other offices of state are more competitive between the hard right and harder right. ... Dorothy Moon, a member of the far-right John Birch Society, is a contender for secretary of state."
^James Dawson, Idaho Gov. Brad Little wins GOP primary over Trump's pick, Lt. Gov. Janice McGeachin, Boise State Public Radio News (May 17, 2022): "Other far-right candidates are following McGeachin's lead by seeking statewide office in the Republican Party primary. ... Two state lawmakers, Dorothy Moon and Mary Souza, who both falsely insist that President Biden lost the 2020 presidential election, want to become Idaho secretary of state."