User talk:Taxmiester

November 2022

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

ser! ^{(chat to me - see my edits)} 20:36, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Far-Right has a definition. Dorothy Moon does not meet the definition of Far-Right, and it sounds like the editor is not willing to discuss it. Dorothy is simply farther right of the center line than the left would like. The sourced material is all op-ed pieces with the authors using Far-Right hyperbole to make a point, and should not be enough to label Dorothy Moon Far-Right or extremist.

From Wikipedia's page on Far-Right:

"Historically used to describe the experiences of Fascism, Nazism, and Falangism, far-right politics now include neo-fascism, neo-Nazism, the Third Position, the alt-right, racial supremacism, National Bolshevism (culturally only) and other ideologies or organizations that feature aspects of authoritarian, ultra-nationalist, chauvinist, xenophobic, theocratic, racist, homophobic, transphobic, and/or reactionary views." Taxmiester (talk) 14:38, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dorothy Moon

Moved to Talk:Dorothy Moon

– ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:20, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 98.46.107.22 (talk) 14:22, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Far-Right has a definition. Dorothy Moon does not meet the definition of Far-Right, and it sounds like the editor is not willing to discuss it. Dorothy is simply farther right of the center line than the left would like. The sourced material is all op-ed pieces with the authors using Far-Right hyperbole to make a point, and should not be enough to label Dorothy Moon Far-Right or extremist.

From Wikipedia's page on Far-Right:

"Historically used to describe the experiences of Fascism, Nazism, and Falangism, far-right politics now include neo-fascism, neo-Nazism, the Third Position, the alt-right, racial supremacism, National Bolshevism (culturally only) and other ideologies or organizations that feature aspects of authoritarian, ultra-nationalist, chauvinist, xenophobic, theocratic, racist, homophobic, transphobic, and/or reactionary views." Taxmiester (talk) 14:38, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry if you feel this isn't constructive. I have provided well thought out arguments for my changes and I get back childish responses. This is very frustrating. Taxmiester (talk) 23:35, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Dorothy Moon. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:29, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How do we bring the parties together to reach a resolution? I post facts and they say they aren't budging. I read where you have dispute resolution, but I can't find the actual link. Taxmiester (talk) 23:32, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do recommend to read WP:DR in its entirety; it's worth the time investment. After you have looked at this advice, Talk:Dorothy Moon would be the very first place to go. There is no discussion on the article's talk page yet, so please create one. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:44, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion invitation

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Dorothy Moon § "Far-right". ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:28, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]