Talk:Ditmar Award results

	Australia portal Ditmar Award results is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian literature (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Ditmar Award" and "Ditmar Award results" pages

I don't believe the two pages should be "merged", but do believe the two pages need a complete re-format. The Ditmar Award page is fine as far as it goes, so long as the only recent winners shown are the MOST recent. All the other winners should be on another page(s).

The Ditmar Award Results page should contain all awards and shortlists but it's really becoming too long. The first year listed is 1969, so we now have thirty years of awards. With later years now listing 13 awards the whole thing is becoming unwieldy. Maybe a split of this page into decades might be an idea. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 05:35, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My inclination would be to look for changes to the categories. The 1989 awards were the last with an "International" category. The 2001 awards were the first with an award for Best New Talent. So, we could start with 1969-1989, 1990-2000, and 2001 onward. The latest results could be left on the "Ditmar Award results" page, until it becomes time to split it again. --Thomas Bull (talk) 21:52, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An alternative would be to split the results by category, bearing in mind that some categories can or could be merged. A split could use the potential merged categories (e.g., "Short Fiction") rather than the component categories (e.g., "Novella or Novelette"). --Thomas Bull (talk) 20:34, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Order of entries

Maybe we should reverse the order of entries - start with 2009 and then work backwards to 1969! 203.56.94.11 (talk) 01:01, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That would be a start but it still leaves us with a very long page. --Perry Middlemiss (talk) 03:37, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"William Atheling Jr. Award" page

A page for the "William Atheling Jr. Award" exists. Should it be replaced by a redirect to the "Ditmar Award" page? Should the part attempting to list history of the award be replaced by reference to this page? Should the results for that Award be moved to that page? --Thomas Bull (talk) 22:24, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling

Witch King

The novel by Russell Blackford that was nominated in 1984 for both Best Australian Long Science Fiction or Fantasy and Best International Fiction was The Tempting of the Witch King rather than The Tempting of the Witchking. --Thomas Bull (talk) 01:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

specfic

In "Australian Specfic in focus", "specfic" is not a typo for "specific". It's short for "speculative fiction". --Thomas Bull (talk) 01:33, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rhizome

Cathy Cupitt had a fanzine named The Rhizome Factor (with an I rather than a Y). --Thomas Bull (talk) 10:50, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nabakov

The short story by Paul Collins in Australian Short Stories 63 is "The Nabakov Affair". --Thomas Bull (talk) 10:50, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mangazine

In "JAMWAF Mangazine", "Mangazine" is not a typo for "Magazine". JAMWAF stands for "Japanese Anime Mangazine for West Australian Fans". --Thomas Bull (talk) 07:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ERNI

In "James Morrow and the ERNI", "ERNI" is an acronym for "extensively recomplicated nasty irony". (To confirm this, see "James Morrow and the ERNI: A reply to Scott Campbell and John Clute" by Bruce Gillespie in his Scratch Pad 6 (https://efanzines.com/SFC/ScratchPad/scrat006.pdf)). --Thomas Bull (talk) 10:38, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BAM

The Courier-Mail newspaper has or had a section or supplement called "BAM", short for "Books, Arts, Music". --Thomas Bull (talk) 10:19, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinking the books

In case anyone is watching, is there any specific reason why the books that have wikipages aren't wikilinked? It seems to me like they should be, but wondering if there was some rationale that I'm not seeing. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:32, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Ditmar Award results/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The results of the Ditmar Awards seem too lengthy to include with an analysis of the Awards themselves. I think separate articles would be more appropriate.--Alarchdu 15:36, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 15:36, 4 December 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 13:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ditmar Award results. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060419044400/http://asif.dreamhosters.com:80/doku.php to http://asif.dreamhosters.com/doku.php
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060429022831/http://ticonderogaonline.org:80/ to http://ticonderogaonline.org
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://roberthood.net/blog)

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:51, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]