Talk:Distribution of lightning

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Weather: Thunderstorms / Tornadoes Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tornadoes portal This article is supported by WikiProject Severe weather (assessed as Low-importance).

Merging related pages & other suggestions

These pages should be merged, linked or not as varied.

"Keraunic" was the old method of determining strike frequency, based on "if thunder was heard at a location, it counted as a data point in determining frequency" aka isokeraunic maps, and it was the basis from which lightning protection systems were designed.

Lightning_detection - also related
Lightning_prediction_system - related, but not even sources

I would also suggest it is reorganized in a manner similar to the following

What it is & why its important?
Methods used for determining it, aka history... 1) by "sound" (keraunic), 2) ground-based detection & 3) satellite-based detection
Highlights... ie The Congo has the highest frequency in Africa (& world), Florida for US, etc.

Freeze level significance

Also, although freeze level of the cloud is valid, I don't know that ground elevation is that important in determining frequency... Florida for example has more because warm moist air currents come from both sides and meet over dryer ground, causing atmospheric disturbances & lots of lightning... elevation is secondary.

Strike Strength vs Frequency

To the best of my understanding... ground elevation and distance between cloud & ground has more influence on lightning strength.... Florida at sea level has very powerful strikes, New Mexico at ~5000ft msl are much weaker.

Borealdreams (talk) 21:07, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Distribution of lightning. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/planetearth/space_lightning_991216.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:08, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Distribution of lightning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140513181525/http://askville.amazon.com/lightning-strike-Earth/AnswerViewer.do?requestId=3738117 to http://askville.amazon.com/lightning-strike-Earth/AnswerViewer.do?requestId=3738117

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:23, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Distribution of lightning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Name change: Lightning Climatology? (+ reworking?)

I sort of like Lightning Distribution better as being more comfortable terminology for a wider audience... but it's a struggle because we have a subsection CALLED distribution... plus we have a section on the proportion of strike types, which, if being picky, doesn't fit with the title. Certainly up for seeing this article reorganized and/or made more thorough, and perhaps even merging some of the data in the summary in the main lightning article into here and shorting the information to keys there? Any help welcome! JeopardyTempest (talk) 07:45, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]