Jump to content

Talk:Disney v. DeSantis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why such an article like this is allowed with emotional languages? That makes it no longer simply reporting the truth but siding with one party. Wikipedia needs to extract those people out if they violate the neutrality of journalism. Otherwise, Wikipedia will stay as an entertainment source of information and serious researchers will not cite from Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:9001:18F0:79C0:ED58:C98:D161:4E7 (talk) 19:10, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP is not news

[edit]

I'm surprised to find this article topic. It's a pretty current and rapidly changing event that is clearly not concluded. 76.178.169.118 (talk) 19:23, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Online Response" section

[edit]

Does anyone think that this section provides value? The first sentence about Reddit is uncited and, and the second sentence is about one random blog. Neither of which appear to be notable. EatTrainCode (talk) 13:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]