Jump to content

Talk:Disney Television Animation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NPOV

[edit]

Regarding Funny Story About Barry Blumberg and the "Spirit of Tom Ruzicka"

This does not seem to reflect a Neutral Point of View, should it be removed from the article?

TV content ratings

[edit]

Per WP:MOSTV, the content ratings for the programs have been removed. These ratings would only apply in the United States, and certainly wouldn't appear on a Malaysian TV program that has never aired in the United States. If you believe these ratings are notable, please provide your opinions and citations of policy and of the ratings themselves. The latter especially, since many of these shows predate the American content ratings. --McDoobAU93 21:52, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey McDoobAU93, I agree with this removal. For the benefit of the contributors, the inclusion of this information is problematic for a few reasons, one of them being verifiability. There are virtually no sources presented for this information outside of the primary sources, and we can't base the bulk of our content on primary sources, i.e. the show itself. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:48, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Leroy & Stitch

[edit]

Wasn't Leroy & Stitch a direct-to-video/DVD film? 71.95.53.89 (talk) 02:40, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

According to Leroy & Stitch, it premiered on Disney Channel a few days before its DVD release.--Carniolus (talk) 21:32, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Silent edit war

[edit]

@Mister134: and @Mkrgolf:, would you please do a favor for the rest of the editors who have this article watchlisted and actually discuss the edit war you are currently engaged in, instead of silently changing and reverting?

This constant back and forth is disruptive. This is a community project, and we discuss changes with one another. Adding unsourced content doesn't make the project any stronger or any more accurate, and reverting to previous versions of unsourced content doesn't particularly help either. You both have to step up and start adding sources and using edit summaries. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:15, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 February 2015

[edit]

Playhouse Disney/Disney Junior original series

[edit]
Title Original running Notes
PB&J Otter 1998–2000 co-production with Jumbo Pictures
Mickey Mouse Clubhouse 2006–present
My Friends Tigger & Pooh 2007–2010
Special Agent Oso 2009–2012
Jake and the Never Land Pirates 2011–present
Sofia the First 2012–present
The Adventures of Disney Fairies 2014–present
The Lion Guard[1] 2015-present
Salmigondis: The Animated Series 2017

109.9.5.158 (talk) 16:04, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Disney Channel Preps New 'Lion King' Series, TV Movie Franchise". Variety. June 10, 2014. Retrieved June 13, 2014.
Not done: as you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 16:08, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 8 July 2015

[edit]

Disney TVA recently launched a new website for recruiting talent. We should add this to the Websites: http://dtvatalent.disney.com/ Ninmura (talk) 21:03, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What encyclopedic value does that add to the article? Many companies have online recruitment - in fact, I would say that the vast majority of companies notable enough to have a Wikipedia article have an online recruitment tool somewhere. We're not here to advertise for them, and Disney is no different. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 21:37, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fully concur with user ElHep. Non-notable. It's like saying that John Lasseter wears a shirt. So does everyone else. (As opposed to the fact that Lasseter primarily wears only Hawaiian shirts and owns over a thousand of them, which is notable.) --Coolcaesar (talk) 06:40, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's not so much about encyclopedic value, but having the the data in the infobox be current and valid. The current "Website" link points to a dead link.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninmura (talk • contribs)
The dead link has now been removed. Stickee (talk) 04:16, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How about Rugrats and Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius?

[edit]

Rugrats and Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius are NOT produced by Disney Television Animation, they are produced by Nickelodeon Studios. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.51.84.128 (talk) 22:30, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What are you referring to exactly? These titles do not appear in the article. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:01, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 July 2016

[edit]


Disney Television Animation 2016 2017

178.167.173.84 (talk) 14:02, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: as you have not made a request in the form "Please replace XX with YY" or "Please add ZZ between PP and QQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 14:15, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 October 2016

[edit]


Muppet Babies a tv reboot series in 2018

178.167.200.128 (talk) 13:25, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: as you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 13:42, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Disney Television Animation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:22, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Films to potentially add

[edit]

I noticed that the following films were missing from the "Filmography" section of the article. Is there any reason why these were omitted and if not can these be added?

Thanks. Kidburla (talk) 18:50, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 5 September 2017

[edit]

I would like to add in series production codes for each Disney TVA series such as 474S for Star vs the Forces of Evil, 618G for Gravity Falls 474studio (talk) 15:36, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 15:58, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cronological list vs tv blocks channel

[edit]

I made a few months ago temporary edits to show how shows flow chronologically rather than by blocks and TV channels if anyone prefers that setup they can change the consensus in this article. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Disney_Television_Animation&oldid=873270190 DoctorHver (talk) 11:57, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I like this (though it's weird that Clerks is at the very end). You should probably add an extra column that notes what channel(s) it aired on during its original run, but this is a lot more convenient.Zemblant (talk) 15:51, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
My temporary list would be more convenient with that extra column as you say, might look into trying to make that version the official one, but the current the division episodes into broadcast blocks as it currently is not something that doesn't happen at any other animation studio Wikipedia article far as know. not over at Warner Bros Animation, not at Hanna-Barbera, not at Filmation just to name few. DoctorHver (talk) 06:15, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

background for Disney Television Animation

[edit]

I heard of an article that says that it was because of the creation of Disneyland that Walt Disney felt it was too expensive to make an in-house animated T.V. series and I cannot find that article anywhere. I want to know where the background section came from. --Evope (talk) 19:10, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Other Media

[edit]

I have a feeling this article doesn't keep up to date with it's filmography. According to the Wikipedia page for Titmouse, Inc., the section focusing on short films says something about a television pilot they produced called Very Important House for Disney Television Animation. Shouldn't that be notable too? There needs to be a section mentioning the rejected pilots of the company, just like how the Wikipedia pages for Nickelodeon Animation Studio and Cartoon Network Studios did! ShredzTyro12 (talk) 19:20, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems the official D23 also has this problem as no animated shows from Disney Television animation after the The Owl House was first relesed has its own sections Disneys official A-Z encyclopedia entries on the D23.com website https://d23.com/disney-a-to-z/ or list of TV shows https://d23.com/a-to-z/television/ even if Live-action shows seems to be uptodate. DoctorHver (talk) 16:53, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a Small World: The Animated Series

[edit]

Wasn't It's a Small World: The Animated Series a television series? 186.220.197.235 (talk) 06:49, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced table

[edit]

The Theatrical films table is entirely {{unreferenced}}. Please consider removing it or please start adding some references. All that box office information should be properly referenced. Each and every Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic score should be reliable referenced. Wikipedia:Verifiability is a core principal, not an optional extra. -- 109.79.72.233 (talk) 04:13, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The table was previously a short list, and the lack of sources goes all the way back to 2018 when the table was first added.[10] The number column was included from that time too even though it is entirely redundant to the release date column. The addition of the story and screenplay columns making the table even wider and more cluttered was more recent (2022).[11] Despite layout changes, the table remains entirely unsourced. -- 109.77.204.193 (talk) 18:46, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 July 2022

[edit]

Referring to new series named KIFF set to air in 2023 (# 93 on filmography list).

1. Name "Nic Small" should be changed to "Nic Smal" - (co creator of the series along with Lucy Heavens). Currently there are two "l"s at the end of his name. This is incorrect and should be spelled "Nic Smal" - refer to sources.

2. Kent Osborne did not create/develop this original series. He is credited as co-producer not executive producer or co-creator; refer to sources. His name should be removed. In the "creators/developers" column it should only read "Lucy Heavens" and "Nic Smal". HelenLemon (talk) 01:15, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Partly done: Both sources say Kent Osborne is a Story Editor for KIFF. Aaron Liu (talk) 02:36, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 November 2022

[edit]
Muhammad syahmi syafiq (talk) 04:12, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Muhammad syahmi syafiq (talk) 04:13, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 04:26, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Website

[edit]

I just removed https://disneytvanimation.com from the page because clicking it reveals that it's a fan account, connected to https://twitter.com/DisneyTVANews, which wrote in its bio that it isn't affiliated with the company. I've only been able to note the animation company's presence on social media like LinkedIn and Twitter - it doesn't seem to be linked anywhere on Disney corporate websites, so does it even have an official website beyond Twitter? Fallbackintoreality (talk) 12:24, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: 20th-21st Century Art, Performance and Media

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 August 2023 and 6 October 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): GHewit (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by GHewit (talk) 05:05, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Disney_Television_Animation&oldid=1227829367"