Talk:Digital journalism

Journalism High‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet Mid‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 January 2020 and 27 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tuk40450.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tymiller, NicholeC.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

What do you think about defining journalism this way? Ctracy1 (talk) 21:10, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

With defining Digital Journalism the way that the description defines, we are allowing everyone to become a journalist. No matter who you are, what degree you may or may not have, you have the capabilities to become a journalist. If you blog, post videos on YouTube or any other video sharing website you could be considered a journalist. I believe this is an appropriate approach of digital journalism. As discussed in our lecture readings, one main purpose of journalism is providing the audience with accurate news. What better way than with the citizens?

Journalism has grown a long way from the early years of sending a paper around to your neighbors of the happenings to now with television news stations and the Internet. With this more and more people are able to access the news. Even without television you could receive the newspaper, and even yet, you could use your computer or the public library’s computer to access the Internet. -Kathleen Monk

There are lots of talks that traditional journalism as we know it is dying; however, it is only just beginning. Digital journalism is reshaping the way we distribute and receive our news. No longer is the responsibility solely on the reporters to go out, get the news then report on it; now citizens are able to share their take on news and voice their opinion publicly.

One of the most important things about the growth of digital journalism is the shift from the “one-to-many” model to the new “many-to-many” model. With the old model, news was determined by the few to distribute to the many, so even if you could not relate or did not agree with the news that was being published, there were really no other options. Now, with the “many-to-many” model, virtually anyone can publish what they feel is newsworthy and gear it towards specific audiences who can relate to their opinions.

Digital journalism is revolutionizing the way we view our news, and has created a means for average citizens to become “journalists”. -Marissa McNees —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.228.224.105 (talk) 16:48, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think Digital journalism can be described as a rapidly growing concept that has changed the traditional means of communication, shifting from print to online media. More and more people are becoming involved in broadcasting news in the form of citizen journalists. It is these people who are changing the face of news, making it readily accessible and available to anyone. Rather than newspaper companies controlling the presses (one-to-many communication model) everyday citizens can put whatever they want on the Internet for the world to see (the many-to-many model) -Carrie Kennedy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.76.106.28 (talk) 00:23, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe with everything, in order to progress, there has to be change. I feel the same way about digital journalism. I know many who believe what's important is keeping tradition alive, but nothing stays the same and the main focus of journalism should always be to be objective, and express facts and opinions in a logical way, the medium that we use to express these things shouldn't matter that much.164.76.243.185 (talk) 15:44, 2 December 2009 (UTC)Adrienne Conner[reply]

Rename article?

Journalism is a profession and activity carried out by people. In itself it has nothing to do with digital media, which are merely the means of transmitting the journalistic product. As such, referring to electronic or digital journalism is a misnomer. It would be more accurate to talk about "journalism in digital/electronic media". For that reason I propose a name-change or consolidation of this article under a more appropriate heading.

My interest is professional: I have been a journalist for more than 20 years, starting with a manual typewriter, a camera using film (not digital memory), and a tape recorder. Later on I used PCs, desktop publishing software, digital cameras and recorders, and HTML editors to produce output in print, online and for radio broadcast. My point is that the practice and methodology of journalism never changed. Only the tools and output media altered.

It seems to me that to speak of "digital journalism" implies a practice distinct from "journalism" without a qualifier. If that is to be the subject of this entry, the case doesn't appear to be made clearly enough.

Comments?

Regards --Peter S Strempel (talk) 13:03, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think if there is a term like broadcast journalism, digital journalism should be encouraged. SandisterTei (talk) 19:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 25 Edit

These are the edits I will do:

-Move overview section to the beginning of the article. Give more basic information and move the FTC issue to the blog section.

-Make the history section the second section of the article. Give more information about the history of online/digital journalism after the history of teletext. I'll write of videotex, then the rise of digital journalism and the first commercial web browsers and the basic state of digital journalism at that time. Then I will give a brief summary of it in today's world.

-Contribute information regarding blogging as a source of news in the blog section

-Contribution information to the citizen journalism section: a one sentence comparison with corporate journalism and one sentence about an example of citizen journalism that builds off the claim left in the previous edit of this page that citizen journalism is effective when there are citizen editors

-Add a references list in addition to the footnotes.--Teedaniel (talk) 05:42, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Digital journalism sites of record? [Query]

Is there a digital journalism equivalent of this article and list: Newspaper of record? I've searched, but can't find one. Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 00:56, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Digital journalism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:54, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

citation

In the History section, it would be better to add more reliable citations to support the information. Also in the section, Impact on Publishers, there are not enough references to unnamed sources of information, such as "many people say" and "most websites reporting". MelodyYifan (talk) 16:18, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

These are two of the sources I was thinking of using to help improve this article.

Fenton, N. "News in the Digital Age," in Routledge Companion to News & Journalism, Pages-557-567

Harcup--Alternative Journalism as Active Citizenship — Preceding unsigned comment added by NicholeC (talk • contribs) 23:51, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edits April 2020

Hello Wikipedian Editors, I've made a few grammar edits, added sources, citations, photo's, and other information to Digital Journalism. Please take a look and any feedback would be greatly appreciated and welcomed. Tuk40450 (talk) 20:42, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BC

"Original reporting remains a challenge on the Internet as the burdens of verification and legal risks (especially from plaintiff-friendly jurisdictions like BC) remain high in the absence of any net-wide approach to defamation." Can the 'BC' reference be clarified? Does it refer to British Columbia, Baja California, Boston College, the British Council? Macadavy (talk) 10:21, 21 February 2022 (UTC) Macadavy[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of Toronto supported by WikiProject Wikipedia and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Fall term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:27, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Digital Communication

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2023 and 17 March 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sanders.b.d, Kayloryates (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Cjmckinley06, Melaninari, MizuAzul.

— Assignment last updated by Jamie.green-2 (talk) 18:17, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Criticism as Praxis

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 February 2024 and 24 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): NathanielB2020 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by NathanielB2020 (talk) 20:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]