Jump to content

Talk:Digimon Racing

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleDigimon Racing has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 12, 2010Good article nomineeListed
April 12, 2010WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Digimon Racing/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Against Criteria

[edit]

1. PASS

A) Pass
B) Pass

2. (FAILED 2B) PASS!

A) Pass
B) FAIL. Please source the introduction. Sources are on the bottom, but the information in the intro is not sourced.
Stuff in the intro should not be sourced unless it contains specific quotes that have to be attributed. Tezero (talk) 21:28, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(b) it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; (emphasis added) This fails the bolded part Hamtechperson 03:13, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What statistics, or really anything in the intro, are likely to be challenged? Tezero (talk) 21:20, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
When I changed the info there, you reverted based on a source. The portion attributed to the source was contradictory. Also, see WP:OWN. You look to me like you are OWNing the article. Hamtechperson 13:24, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
How is it contradictory? Your comment about ownership concerns me. Perhaps it seems that I am overly defensive of a small group of sources, but it's because the article has a fairly limited subject matter; therefore, there aren't too many reliable sources out there for me to use. I'll add the source to the intro if you want. Tezero (talk) 01:38, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'd appreciate that. The operative word in my last comment was WAS. Sorry about the (now stricken) OWNership comment. Hamtechperson 17:21, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Passed by decision of reviewer at 01:53, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

C) Pass

3. PASS

A) Pass
B) Pass

4. Pass

5. Pass

6. PASS

A) Pass
B) Pass

Reviewer: Hamtechperson 02:48, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Other Users

[edit]

It would be helpful to restate the questions here rather than an outline with just PASS/FAIL; that way I don't have to keep flipping between the criteria and the assessment. --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 03:00, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So was this passed and just not listed as such, or are we still waiting for the sourcing? --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib)
I did the sourcing thing. I thought it was listed as passed. Maybe he forgot to remove it. I'll check GAN. Tezero (talk) 03:48, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind, everything looks fine. --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 09:51, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Digimon Racing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:24, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Digimon Racing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:08, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Digimon_Racing&oldid=1201526979"