Talk:Diet and cancer

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Diet and cancer article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative medicine

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Microplastics#Humans|Microplastics ingested through diet]] The anchor (Humans) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Red & processed meat and colorectal cancer

This entry looks very brief. Would it be appropriate to expand on it (based on the IARC report)? There are two main hypotheses - the role of haem in red & processed meat, and the role of nitrite. There is some controversy about the latter, but I think it would be appropriate to mention it. Ggux (talk) 19:42, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think this would be an appropriate expansion. The underlying mechanism of how haem iron causes DNA damage and cell death is now even better understood. CarlFromVienna (talk) 06:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edits by Atchoum

Atchoum is repeatedly adding a dodgy source published by Frontiers Media [1]. This is a very weak source and because higher quality reviews exist we shouldn't be citing content from Frontiers Media. The paper should be removed from Wikipedia. Psychologist Guy (talk) 16:57, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This journal is MEDLINE approved : "MEDLINE’s Scientific Quality Review is a rigorous, multi-step process in which many factors are assessed. NLM views each journal comprehensively, rather than basing a decision on a defined list of criteria. Each title is reviewed by multiple individuals both within the NLM and the LSTRC, and final decisions are based on input from all these sources. The final decision of whether to index a journal for MEDLINE is made by the Director of the NLM. "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medline/medline_journal_selection.html people prefer to revert than search paper unfortunately ! Atchoum (talk) 17:11, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter if it is MEDLINE approved, it's sadly true that a few crap journals make their way on there. So is MDPI'S Nutrients (journal) which is also a bogus predatory journal. Anything by Frontiers Media or MDPI is not high-quality. They are considered predatory publishing by the majority of academics. We don't need to be citing weak sources because as stated better quality reviews exist. Psychologist Guy (talk) 17:41, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]