Talk:Dichapetalum cymosum

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

South Africa Mid‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sites with its photo

These sites have photos of this plant: [[1]] and [[2]].Agre22 (talk) 01:39, 10 May 2009 (UTC)agre22[reply]

Map showing distribution

A map showing the distribution of the Gifblaar plant in Southern Africa would be very informative. Unfortunately, I am not very good at Photoshop or image editing so if anybody else can create such a map that would be great. Otherwise, give me time and I will create the map myself (I should learn image editing anyway) if it is not up within the next few weeks. --User:DiscipleOfKnowledge (talk) 14:00, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I always wonder a bit how much one should try to do everything one's self, versus how much to collaborate and get others that are specialists, make their contributions which may be faster and better. It can be very motivational to find people at Wiki that are clearly good at what they do (I even have a little list at the bottom of my userpage). For simple things like crops and uploads, I've enjoyed learning how to do it (and to it). That said, I've been involved with pages where clearly, I could not have gotten the quality of the images or tables done by myself (see the range map in "Painted turtle".

My advice to you, would be to request help from FS. If you can describe the range geographically or give a source that shows it, he can construct a nice range map for you. You could kinda mention the fluorine connect as he is already pretty involved in that page as we take it to FA. Plus he is a super nice guy. If he doesn't have time, then go to the image help desk and track down someone else. Or learn how to do it...and then have them pretty it up.

One thing...I would be very strict about making sure we define the range as best we know it. Since you are the one involved in the article, looking at sources, you will be the one who knows which source is more reliable when they differ (and make the call on what we display). Also, urge you to make sure that range map and article text are consistent. That drives me up a wall, when I am reading an animal article and there is disagreement of map and text (don't know which to trust and makes me question if either agrees with sources).TCO (talk) 14:19, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

photo of the plant, showing serveral parts growing up

Text talks about (and I have seen on the web [3]) pics of many plants grouped together. If we could get a pic like that would help illustrate the "root network" concept. I just splatted all my pics into this article, but we could cut some of them also, in priority of one that shows something more helpful.TCO (talk) 14:30, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gifblaar.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Gifblaar.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:12, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dichapetalum cymosum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110815103016/http://www.chem.harvard.edu/groups/myers/pdf_publications/jac_2001_123_7207.pdf to http://www.chem.harvard.edu/groups/myers/pdf_publications/jac_2001_123_7207.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]